June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
In Vivo Agreement of Intraocular Pressures Simultaneously Measured Using Tonometer and Manometers Placed in Anterior and Vitreous Cavity under General Anesthesia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hyun Seung Yang
    Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • June-Gone Kim
    Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Hyun Seung Yang, None; June-Gone Kim, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 1980. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hyun Seung Yang, June-Gone Kim; In Vivo Agreement of Intraocular Pressures Simultaneously Measured Using Tonometer and Manometers Placed in Anterior and Vitreous Cavity under General Anesthesia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):1980.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To analyze the agreement between three intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using tonometer and manometers placed in anterior chamber (AC) and vitreous cavity (VC) in various vitreous conditions and their association with ocular properties.

 
Methods
 

Sixty nine patients who were planning to have vitreous surgery for epiretinal membrane or macular hole (ERM and MH; n=26), vitreous hemorrhage (DMVH; n=24), or silicone oil removal (n=19) were included consecutively in this prospective study. One examiner, who was blinded to the patient’s information, performed a complete ophthalmologic examination, including the corneal thickness (CT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AL). Another examiner simultaneously measured IOP using Tonopen AVIA® and 2 automated transducers during the surgery (Fig. 1).

 
Results
 

The mean POAIOP, ACIOP and VCIOP were 16.7±3.7 mmHg, 16.7±3.8 mmHg and 16.0±4.6mmHg, respectively. The correlations between POAIOP and ACIOP, between ACIOP and VCIOP, and between POAIOP and VCIOP were all very good (R=0.92, 0.65, and 0.76, respectively). However, the VCIOP was significantly higher compared with POAIOP or ACIOP in the ERM and MH group (by 1.4 and 1.5 mmHg, respectively), butsignificantly lower in the DMVH (by -1.0 and -1.1 mmHg, respectively) and the silicone oil groups (by -2.8 and -2.7 mmHg, respectively) (Fig.2). In the multivariate analysis, only CT among ocular properties was significantly correlated with POAIOP (p<0.037) and the increase in POAIOP per 100 um of CT was about 2.7 mmHg.

 
Conclusions
 

Generally, transducers in AC and VC provide IOP measurements that correlate well with those offered by tonopen and are not affected by the patient’s individual ocular properties such as CT, ACD and AL, though CT affected Tono-pen AVIA® measurement. However, the VCIOP using transducer overestimated the ACIOP or POAIOP in normal vitreous condition, whereas significantly underestimated depending on the associated pathologic vitreous conditions especially in silicone-oil filled eyes. Thus, IOP measured by VC transducer in certain vitreous conditions needs further validation about the real IOP difference or measurement error.

 
 
Fig 1. Schematic drawing of setup for the simultaneous measurement of IOP.
 
Fig 1. Schematic drawing of setup for the simultaneous measurement of IOP.
 
 
Fig 2. Box plots of IOP measured by tonopen and two transducers located in AC and VC in 3 groups.
 
Fig 2. Box plots of IOP measured by tonopen and two transducers located in AC and VC in 3 groups.
 
Keywords: 568 intraocular pressure • 763 vitreous  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×