June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Metamorphopsia in Retinopathy Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Emily Wiecek
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Opthalmology, Harvard Medical, Boston, MA
  • Kameran Lashkari
    Opthalmology, Harvard Medical, Boston, MA
    Opthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA
  • Steven Dakin
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Peter Bex
    Opthalmology, Harvard Medical, Boston, MA
    Opthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Emily Wiecek, None; Kameran Lashkari, Circadian Technologies (F), Regeneron (R); Steven Dakin, None; Peter Bex, Adaptive Sensory Technology, LLC (S), Rapid Assessment of Visual Sensitivity (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 2185. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Emily Wiecek, Kameran Lashkari, Steven Dakin, Peter Bex; Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Metamorphopsia in Retinopathy Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):2185.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Metamorphopsia (perceived distortion of visual space) is commonly experienced by patients with retinal pathology. Although this distortion is typically measured with Amsler charts, more objective and quantitative assessments are desirable for effective monitoring of the presence, progression, and remediation of visual impairment. We compare qualitative assessments with novel quantitative methods across a range of retinal pathologies.

Methods: An eleven-item questionnaire assessed metamorphopsia symptoms in 80 patients with monocular distortion from maculopathy. All patients completed an Amsler assessment (presented on a computer screen with fixation compliance monitored by an eye tracker), and 35 patients additionally completed two novel objective measures of metamorphopsia in the central five degrees of visual field. One task required participants to arrange dots in a square (combining spatial bisection and Vernier hyperacuities), and the other used spatial alignment of dichoptically-presented targets. A dichoptic task was also used as a binary measure of inter-ocular suppression.

Results: Monocular distortions were suppressed by undistorted vision in the better eye in 45% of patients. Questionnaire scores from non-suppressing patients positively correlated with distortion measures; however there was no relationship between subjective and quantitative assessments for patients who experienced suppression (p =.03). There was significant negative correlation in the overall vertical direction of distortion between the two novel quantitative distortion assessments (p = .05), as well as a positive correlation between the directional displacement measured in the dichoptic task and the gaze-contingent Amsler grid quantification (p = .01). There were no significant correlations between localized measures of visual distortion across all three measures.

Conclusions: The onset and progression of visual impairment may be underreported in maculopathy due to the suppression of distorted visual input from the more impaired eye. It is critical to assess metamorphopsia monocularly, and we have introduced novel metrics to quantify such visual distortion in central vision.

Keywords: 717 space and scene perception • 584 low vision • 585 macula/fovea  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×