June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Darks are detected faster and more accurately than lights in normal subjects and patients with moderate glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Linxi Zhao
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, NY
  • Mitchell Dul
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, NY
  • Jose Alonso
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, NY
  • Stanley Komban
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, NY
  • Qasim Zaidi
    SUNY College of Optometry, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Linxi Zhao, None; Mitchell Dul, None; Jose Alonso, None; Stanley Komban, None; Qasim Zaidi, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 2768. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Linxi Zhao, Mitchell Dul, Jose Alonso, Stanley Komban, Qasim Zaidi; Darks are detected faster and more accurately than lights in normal subjects and patients with moderate glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):2768.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Previous studies have shown that darks are detected faster and more accurately than lights, when presented in noisy backgrounds (Komban et al., 2011). We investigated how these differences in detection time and accuracy are affected by age and ganglion cell pathology caused by moderate glaucoma.

Methods: One eye of 8 glaucoma patients, 11 age-matched controls (50-83 y/o) and 3 young control subjects (23-25 y/o) were tested. Subjects were asked to count the number of light or dark targets superimposed on a white noise background as fast as possible. Each presentation contained 1-3 squared targets of 1° / side, located at random positions within the central 30° of the visual field. A total of 600-800 measures were collected for per subject.

Results: We replicate previous findings (Komban et al., 2011) that darks are detected more accurately and faster than lights. We extend these findings by demonstrating that differences in detection time are reliably found across different ages and are also present in subjects with moderate glaucoma. In controls, we demonstrate that detection times increase with age, both for lights (r=0.83, p<0.0001) and darks (r=0.85, p<0.0001) but detection accuracy remains unchanged (lights: r=0.37, p=0.18; darks: r=0.12, p=0.68). The difference in detection time between lights and darks also increases with age (r=0.66, p=0.99). When compared with controls, glaucoma patients showed a significant reduction of 11-15% in detection accuracy (normal/glaucoma, lights: 87.29% / 72.27%, p=0.008, darks: 94.42% / 83.02%, p=0.009, Wilcoxon tests) but not detection time (normal/glaucoma, lights: 2.06 sec / 2.59 sec, p=0.13, darks: 1.47 sec / 1.87 sec, p=0.1, Wilcoxon tests). Differences in accuracy between darks and lights were larger in glaucoma patients but the difference was not large enough to reach significance (normal/glaucoma, 7.14% / 10.75%, p=0.06, Wilcoxon test).

Conclusions: Differences in the detection of darks and light are robust, can be demonstrated over a wide range of ages and in patients with retinal ganglion cell disease caused by glaucoma. The finding that patients with glaucoma show a 15% reduction in detection accuracy raises the question of whether a simple detection test could be used to monitor disease progression.

Keywords: 496 detection • 642 perimetry • 414 aging: visual performance  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.