June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: Rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Matthias Fuest
    Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
  • Nikolaos Mamas
    Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
  • Niklas Plange
    Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3000. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Matthias Fuest, Nikolaos Mamas, Niklas Plange; Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: Rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3000.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is influenced by corneal properties. The effect of corneal edema on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using Rebound tonometry (RT) is not clear. In this study, IOP was measured before and after cataract surgery using GAT and RT to investigate differences between methods and the effect of corneal edema

Methods: Thirty patients with cataract were included in a prospective study. IOP was measured using GAT and RT (Icare PRO, Tiolat Oy, Finland) before and one day after phacoemulsification. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined before and after surgery (Pentacam, Oculus, Germany) to quantify postsurgical corneal edema.

Results: CCT increased significantly after surgery by 52.2 ±35.1µm (p<0.0001). IOP values of GAT and RT were significantly correlated before surgery (r=0.65, p<0.0001) and after surgery (r=0.94, p<0.0001). No significant correlation of GAT and RT to CCT before surgery (GAT: r=0.18, p=0.36; RT: r=0.03, p=0.87) or after surgery (GAT: r=-0.08, p=0.69; RT: r=0.17, p=0.37) was found. The difference between GAT and RT (GAT-RT) was -0.9 ±2.9mmHg (range -6.2 - 6.4mmHg) before surgery and -1.1 ±2.2mmHg (range -5.1 - 4.8mmHg, p=0.85) after surgery. Before surgery, a positive correlation of GAT-RT with mean IOP of both methods is apparent (r=0.45, p=0.012). After surgery, no such correlation was found (r=-0.08, p=0.69).

Conclusions: RT underestimates IOP in higher values and overestimates IOP in lower values compared to GAT before surgery. This is not apparent in eyes with corneal edema. Large differences between methods may be present in individual patients with and without corneal edema.

Keywords: 445 cataract • 568 intraocular pressure • 479 cornea: clinical science  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×