June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Comparison of Neovascularization, Opacification and Cornea thickness in a Rabbit Model of Keratoplasty with Interrupted or Continuous Suture Techniques by Cornea fluorescein angiography and corneal OCT
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Maria Parker
    Casey Eye institute, OHSU, Portland, OR
  • Trevor McFarland
    Casey Eye institute, OHSU, Portland, OR
  • Winston Chamberlain
    Casey Eye institute, OHSU, Portland, OR
  • Scott Ellis
    OBM UK limited, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Kyriacos Mitrophanous
    OBM UK limited, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Tim Stout
    Casey Eye institute, OHSU, Portland, OR
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Maria Parker, None; Trevor McFarland, None; Winston Chamberlain, None; Scott Ellis, Oxford BioMedica (E); Kyriacos Mitrophanous, Oxford BioMedica (UK) Ltd (E); Tim Stout, Clayton Foundation (P), Oxford Biomedica (C), AGTC (F), Peregrine Pharmaceuticals Inc (C), Stem Cells Inc (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3071. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Maria Parker, Trevor McFarland, Winston Chamberlain, Scott Ellis, Kyriacos Mitrophanous, Tim Stout; Comparison of Neovascularization, Opacification and Cornea thickness in a Rabbit Model of Keratoplasty with Interrupted or Continuous Suture Techniques by Cornea fluorescein angiography and corneal OCT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3071.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Although corneal transplantation is one of the most common and successful organ transplants in humans, a significant number donor corneas reject every year. Cornea neovascularization (NV), opacification and increased thickness are all indicators of cornea rejection. One of the factors associated with an increased rate of cornea neovascularization and rejection is the type of suture and suturing technique used to secure the donor button. This study evaluates postkeratopasty outcomes using OCT and angiography following two suture techniques: interrupted or continuous, in a rabbit model of penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

Methods: Twelve New Zealand White rabbits underwent allogenic PK in one eye. The donor cornea was secured with either a continuous 10/0 nylon suture (six animals) or with sixteen 10-0 nylon interrupted sutures (six animals). Transplant rejection was assessed by measuring the area of NV, the level of opacification and the cornea thickness. The area of NV from the limbus into the graft was measured by using corneal fluorescein angiography (FA) and digital measurements. Persistence of opacification was assessed by slit-lamp microscopy and graded on a 0 to 4+ scale. Cornea thickness and cornea astigmatism was measured by ocular coherence topography (OCT). At sacrifice (day 28) the cornea was fixed for histological analysis of neovascularization, inflammation, and rejection.

Results: Corneal neovascularization, opacification, cornea thickness was significantly higher in the interrupted suture group compared to the continuous suture group. (p = 0.006 or less). All corneas in the continuous suture group exhibited minimal neovascularization and generally presented with ≤ 1 opacification at each time point studied. A single running suture results in less postoperative astigmatism compared with the interrupted sutures technique.

Conclusions: Corneas within the interrupted suture group were associated with a significant increased level of neovascularization, opacification and astigmatism followed by a higher rate of rejection. The suturing method appears to be a factor leading to the rate of cornea rejection in a rabbit PK model and may be correlated to human surgical outcomes.

Keywords: 480 cornea: basic science • 551 imaging/image analysis: non-clinical • 609 neovascularization  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×