June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Comparison of Laser-Assisted Removal of Epithelium to Mechanical Debridement in Corneal Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus: 12-Months Results
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ana Laura Canedo
    Cornea Genetic Eye Institute, Beverly Hills, CA
  • Ronald Gaster
    Cornea Genetic Eye Institute, Beverly Hills, CA
  • Yaron Rabinowitz
    Cornea Genetic Eye Institute, Beverly Hills, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Ana Laura Canedo, None; Ronald Gaster, B & L (C), Abbott (I); Yaron Rabinowitz, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3112. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ana Laura Canedo, Ronald Gaster, Yaron Rabinowitz; Comparison of Laser-Assisted Removal of Epithelium to Mechanical Debridement in Corneal Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus: 12-Months Results. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3112. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether removing the epithelium with the laser (PTK) yields better outcomes than mechanical debridement of the epithelium in CXL treatments of patients with progressive keratoconus.

Methods: We analyzed UCVA, BCVA and central K values at 6 months in 67 patients (77 eyes) with progressive keratoconus who had undergone CXL. 16 patients (17 eyes) had their epithelium removed by laser (PTK) and 51 patients (60 eyes) had their epithelium removed by mechanical debridement (Dresden protocol). Statistical significance: p < 0.05

Results: The mean number of lines of improvement in the PTK and mechanical groups were UCVA 1.53 ± 0.49 and 1.28 ± 0.40 lines, respectively; and BCVA 0.24 ± 0.16 and 0.57 ± 0.14 lines, respectively ( p>0.05). The central K values decrease by a mean of 1.35 ± 3.1 and 0.41 ± 3.5 respectively (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Laser-CXL appears to give superior visual results than manual epithelial debridement and may become the procedure of choice for CXL. A possible limitation of this technique is that thinning of the apex of the cone may expose the endothelium to increased toxic effects of the UV light. In our small series to date, endothelial cell counts have not been affected. Larger series of patients with longer follow up is needed before this treatment can be universally recommended.

Keywords: 574 keratoconus • 480 cornea: basic science  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×