June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Refractive Surgery for Accommodative Esotropia in Special Needs Children and Adolescents
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nicholas Faron
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Washington Univ Sch Med, St. Louis, MO
  • James Hoekel
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Washington Univ Sch Med, St. Louis, MO
  • Lawrence Tychsen
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Washington Univ Sch Med, St. Louis, MO
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Nicholas Faron, None; James Hoekel, None; Lawrence Tychsen, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3127. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nicholas Faron, James Hoekel, Lawrence Tychsen; Refractive Surgery for Accommodative Esotropia in Special Needs Children and Adolescents. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3127.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Reports of refractive surgery performed to treat esotropia have been limited to small series or case reports. Here we analyze outcomes in a sizeable number of children and adolescents treated using the excimer laser or phakic intraocular lenses.

Methods: Clinical outcome data were collated prospectively in 54 children and adolescents (108 eyes) treated for hyperopia using excimer laser keratectomy or implantation of phakic IOLs. All children had esotropia; fully accommodative (21 children) or partially-accommodative/mixed mechanism (33 children) and difficulties with spectacle or contact lens wear. Mean age at refractive surgery was 10.2 yrs (range 3 to 18 years); mean follow-up was 2.9 yrs.

Results: Spherical refractive error averaged 4.86 D (range +2.25 to +6.75) in children treated using excimer laser and +9.25 (range +6.75 to +11.5) in those treated by IOL implantation. 90/108 eyes (83%) were corrected to within +/- 1.0 D of target refractive error and all to within 1.5 D. Best-corrected and uncorrected visual acuity improved 0.12 logMAR and 0.58 logMAR respectively. Pre-operative esotropia averaged 6.1 PD wearing refractive correction and 24.4 D not wearing correction. Esotropia after refractive surgery (not wearing correction) was reduced to an average 8.3 D. During the follow-up period 15% (8 children) required strabismus re-operation.

Conclusions: Excimer laser keratectomy or phakic IOL implantation are unusual but useful treatment alternatives for accommodative esotropia in a subpopulation of special needs strabismic children. Refractive surgery for hyperopia reduces substantially the angle of accommodative esotropia in children who have difficulties with spectacle or contacts lens wear. Longer term follow-up will reveal whether refractive regression promotes recurrence of larger heteroptropia.

Keywords: 686 refractive surgery: PRK  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×