June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Exome analysis identified novel mutations in the FAM161A gene in a family with recessive retinal degeneration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jacque Duncan
    Ophthalmology, Univ of California - SF, San Francisco, CA
  • Pooja Biswas
    Shiley Eye Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
  • Igor Kozak
    Shiley Eye Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
  • Mili Navani
    Shiley Eye Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
  • Rafael Caruso
    National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • John Heckenlively
    Ophthalmology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Austin Roorda
    School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  • Radha Ayyagari
    Shiley Eye Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Jacque Duncan, None; Pooja Biswas, None; Igor Kozak, None; Mili Navani, None; Rafael Caruso, None; John Heckenlively, None; Austin Roorda, US Patent #6890076 (P), US Patent #7118216 (P), UC Berkeley (P); Radha Ayyagari, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3347. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jacque Duncan, Pooja Biswas, Igor Kozak, Mili Navani, Rafael Caruso, John Heckenlively, Austin Roorda, Radha Ayyagari; Exome analysis identified novel mutations in the FAM161A gene in a family with recessive retinal degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3347.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To describe the clinical phenotype and identify the molecular basis of disease in an Indian family with autosomal recessive retinal degeneration (RD).

Methods: Five family members were characterized with visual acuity, perimetry, fundus photos, full-field electroretinography (ERG), and optical coherence tomography. Cone photoreceptors surrounding the fovea were imaged in one affected member, the proband, using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. The exome was captured using Nimblegen SeqCap EZ V4.0 probes and sequenced on llumina HiSeq. Read mapping and variant calling were performed with published protocols. Exome variants were analyzed using exomeSuite. Confirmation of variants and segregation analysis were performed using dideoxy sequencing.

Results: Exome analysis detected 30,606 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels in the proband. Analysis of these variants using exomeSuite identified 5 candidate SNVs. Further analysis revealed a novel homozygous nonsense change, c.1105 C>T, p.Arg335Ter, and a rare homozygous probably damaging (PolyPhen score=0.999) change, c.1791 G>T, p.E597D (rs201052209) in the FAM161A gene segregating with RD. These sequence variants were not detected in 100 ethnicity matched controls. Similar to prior reports of RD associated with FAM161A mutations, affected family members were myopic with visual acuity ranging from light perception to 20/40, with progressive visual acuity and field loss beginning at different ages. All affected members showed severely reduced ERG responses and grayish spots extending from the arcades, while prominent bone spicule pigmentary changes were observed only in the proband. Residual cones with increased cone spacing were observed near the fovea despite severely reduced visual acuity in the proband.

Conclusions: Exome analysis revealed two homozygous probably damaging variants in the FAM161A gene segregating with progressive RD. While the novel nonsense mutation alone could be sufficient to cause RD, the effect of the second missense change is not known. The severe progressive vision loss with a range of symptom onset observed among 3 siblings perhaps is a consequence of genetic or environmental modifiers. High-resolution retinal imaging of the proband revealed sparse central cones, suggesting FAM161A is important for normal photoreceptor structure and survival.

Keywords: 696 retinal degenerations: hereditary • 539 genetics • 550 imaging/image analysis: clinical  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×