June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Principal components analysis (PCA) of human cortical contrast response functions reveals two dominant mechanisms: M and P?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Russell Hamer
    Departemento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, São Paulo, Brazil
    Smiith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
  • Givago Souza
    Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil
    Núcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil
  • Thiago Costa
    Departemento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Bruno Gomes
    Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil
  • Luiz Carlos Silveira
    Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil
  • Dora Ventura
    Departemento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Russell Hamer, None; Givago Souza, None; Thiago Costa, None; Bruno Gomes, None; Luiz Carlos Silveira, None; Dora Ventura, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3409. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Russell Hamer, Givago Souza, Thiago Costa, Bruno Gomes, Luiz Carlos Silveira, Dora Ventura; Principal components analysis (PCA) of human cortical contrast response functions reveals two dominant mechanisms: M and P?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3409.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

VEP contrast response functions (CRFs) often manifest two linear limbs on log-contrast (C) axes - a shallow limb at low C, and a steep limb at high-C. These have been hypothesized to reflect M- and P-dominated responses, respectively (e.g., Nakayama & Mackeben, 1982; Bobak et al., 1984; Tyler & Apkarian, 1985; Souza et al., 2007, 2008). We have applied the agnostic procedure of PCA analysis to cortical CRFs obtained with the sweep VEP (sVEP) over a range of spatio-temporal S-T conditions.

 
Methods
 

sVEPs were recorded from 11 subjects while presenting 0.4, 2, 10 or 16 c/d achromatic sinewave gratings (161 cd/m2 mean lum) phase-reversing at 4.29, 6, 10 or 15 Hz. Contrast increased logarithmically from 1.4 to 90% during each 10-s trial. A vector average response at 2F was calculated (10 sweeps/condition). PCA analysis was applied to the sVEP amplitudes from 153 CRFs.

 
Results
 

Two PCA components explained most of the variance (PC1, PC2). All CRFs were reconstructed based on PC1 and PC2. For 2-limbed CRFs, PC1 dominated at low C and significant PC2 amplitude began only for C > 10 - 20%. For 1-limbed CRFs, only PC1 was significant. Both PCs were ~linear on log-C axes. A Naka-Rushton function was fit to each PC, on linear C axes, for all S-T combinations, providing an estimate of contrast gain (Cgain = Rmax/Csat50). Cgains for PC1 were greater than PC2 gains by 1 to 1.5 log units at all S-T combinations. The highest Cgains for PC1 occurred at TFs ≤10 Hz and were ~equal across SF up to 10 c/deg. The lowest gains tended to occur at 15 Hz across SF. For PC2, the highest Cgains occurred at intermediate to high S-T combinations. Analysis of individual 2-limbed CRFs showed that the C at which PC2 starts to contribute significantly is the C at which the sVEP amplitude transitions from one slope to the other and where the phase response suddenly changes (Fig. 1).

 
Conclusions
 

PCA analysis of sVEP CRFs provides support for the working hypothesis that M and P pathway signals combine to generate the overall sVEP CRF, and that these are, to a large degree, separable, with PC1 and PC2 being associated with M and P, respectively.

 
 
Fig. 1 Upper: amplitude (circles) and phase (dashed curve) of 2 sVEP CRFs with 2-limbs. Middle: derivative of phase. Lower: PC1 (circles) and PC2 (squares) derived from amplitudes in upper plots.
 
Fig. 1 Upper: amplitude (circles) and phase (dashed curve) of 2 sVEP CRFs with 2-limbs. Middle: derivative of phase. Lower: PC1 (circles) and PC2 (squares) derived from amplitudes in upper plots.
 
Keywords: 478 contrast sensitivity • 755 visual cortex • 531 ganglion cells  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×