June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Seeking For Circadian Rhythmicity in the Mammalian Photoreceptor Visual Cycle
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yunlu Xue
    Ophthal & Visual Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
    Neuroscience Program, Division of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO
  • Vladimir Kefalov
    Ophthal & Visual Sciences, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Yunlu Xue, None; Vladimir Kefalov, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3425. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yunlu Xue, Vladimir Kefalov; Seeking For Circadian Rhythmicity in the Mammalian Photoreceptor Visual Cycle. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3425.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: The circadian clock regulates many functions of the retina, such as photoreceptor disc shedding, melatonin synthesis and the rod-cone coupling. However, it is unclear whether the circadian clock controls the photoreceptor visual cycle in mammals. We examined this question by measuring rod dark-adaptation using scotopic Electroretinogram (ERG) recordings from C57BL/6 mice.

Methods: The animals we used for the study were 6-12 weeks old wild type (C57BL/6) mice. We used ERG to assess their photoreceptor responses. The animals were dark-adapted over night, anesthetized with Ketamine/Xylazine cocktail, and stabilized for 10 minutes in darkness before the experiment. We recorded the dark-adapted scotopic sensitivity and maximal response before exposing the animals’ eyes to brief bright light, which bleached 90% of the photopigment. We then monitored the dark-adaption of ERG responses, including a-wave sensitivity, and maximal scotopic a- and b-wave amplitudes. Four Zeitgeber time (ZT) points were taken to perform the dark-adaptation test: ZT0, ZT6, ZT 12 and ZT18. At least six retinas for each tested time were used for analysis.

Results: We did not observe any significant difference in the rate of dark-adaptation among the four tested time points (i.e. ZT0, ZT6, ZT 12 and ZT18). The maximal a-wave amplitude recovered to 70% of its pre-bleach level at steady-state with a half-recovery time of about 30 minutes. The maximal b-wave amplitude recovered to 60% at steady-state with a half-recovery time of about 20 minutes. The a-wave sensitivity recovered to 30% at steady state with a half-recovery time of about 30 minutes.

Conclusions: We did not observe any diurnal variation of rod photoreceptor dark-adaptation in the melatonin-deficient C57BL/6 mice. Further studies of rod and cone dark-adaptation in melatonin-sufficient mice are under way.

Keywords: 458 circadian rhythms • 648 photoreceptors • 508 electrophysiology: non-clinical  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×