June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
A Prospective Trial Evaluating Scleral Rebound Tonometry
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shuchi Patel
    Ophthalmology, University of Chicago, Maywood, IL
  • Sara Duke
    Ophthalmology, University of Chicago, Maywood, IL
  • Andrew Logeman
    Ophthalmology, University of Chicago, Maywood, IL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Shuchi Patel, None; Sara Duke, None; Andrew Logeman, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3456. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shuchi Patel, Sara Duke, Andrew Logeman; A Prospective Trial Evaluating Scleral Rebound Tonometry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3456.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Glaucoma is known to occur in about 75% of patients following a keratoprosthesis, but accurate pressure readings to monitor for progression are not possible. Thus we sought to determine if a predictable relationship exists between Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and scleral rebound tonometry (RT) to provide an accurate and reliable assessment of intraocular pressure (IOP) via scleral measurements.

 
Methods
 

A prospective non-randomized trial of individuals 18 years of age and older. Each had his/her IOP measured by GAT, next corneal RT then scleral RT on the inferotemporal sclera. The patient’s age, gender, refractive error, central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL) and phakic status were recorded. Pearson’s correlation and multivariate regression were used for statistical analysis.

 
Results
 

116 eyes from 59 patients (37-90 years old) have been examined to date. Mean GAT IOP was 15.91 mmHg (SD 4.13), mean corneal RT was 14.50 mmHg (SD 4.24) and mean scleral RT was 48.84 (SD 21.41). Mean spherical equivalent refraction (SE) was -0.21 D (SD 2.05), mean CCT was 547.68 µm (SD 45.65), mean AL was 24.06 mm (SD 1.21). 89 eyes were phakic and 27 were pseudophakic. Pearson analysis reveals a strong positive correlation between GAT and corneal RT (0.77) but weak positive correlation between GAT and scleral RT (0.22) as well as corneal RT and scleral RT (0.22). This trend persists when phakic and pseudophakic eyes are evaluated independently. In the final multiple regression model (Table 1) to evaluate the association of GAT, CCT, AL and SE with scleral RT, only CCT in pseudophakic eyes was found to have a significant positive correlation (p=0.04).

 
Conclusions
 

Scleral RT shows IOP measurements that are consistently higher than corneal IOP measurements by roughly 33-34 mmHg. Corneal RT correlates well to the gold standard of IOP measurement, GAT; unfortunately, scleral RT measurements have poor correlation to corneal measurements independent of phakic status. Analysis of scleral RT with relation to GAT, CCT, AL and SE concurrently fails to reveal a statistically significant regression model in either phakic or pseudophakic eyes. Our study reveals that sceral RT does not provide accurate and reliable IOP measurements.

 
 
Final Multivariate Regression Model Assessing the Relationship Between Scleral Rebound Tonometry and Ophthalmic Variables
 
Final Multivariate Regression Model Assessing the Relationship Between Scleral Rebound Tonometry and Ophthalmic Variables
 
Keywords: 575 keratoprostheses • 568 intraocular pressure • 465 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×