June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Retinal Detachments in Eyes After Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sachin Jain
    Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary. UIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
  • Clement Chow
    Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary. UIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
  • Jennifer Lim
    Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary. UIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
  • Lawrence Ulanski
    Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary. UIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
  • Jose De la Cruz
    Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary. UIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
  • Maria Cortina
    Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary. UIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
  • Felix Chau
    Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary. UIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Sachin Jain, None; Clement Chow, None; Jennifer Lim, QLT (F), Genentech (R), Regeneron (R); Lawrence Ulanski, Allergan (C); Jose De la Cruz, alcon (C), amo (C); Maria Cortina, None; Felix Chau, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3473. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sachin Jain, Clement Chow, Jennifer Lim, Lawrence Ulanski, Jose De la Cruz, Maria Cortina, Felix Chau; Retinal Detachments in Eyes After Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3473.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To report the frequency, timing, visual significance, contributing factors, and management of retinal detachment (RD) after successful Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I (KPro) implantation.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of consecutive KPro implantations at a single institution over a 5 year period. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ocular co-morbidities, anatomic outcomes, surgical interventions, and complications were analyzed.

Results: One hundred and three KPros were implanted into 95 eyes of 94 patients over a 5 year period. Fourteen of the 95 eyes (14.7%) developed RDs during a median follow-up of 27.5 months (range 12-58). Pre-KPro diagnoses included HSV keratitis, chemical burn, aniridia, Peters anomaly, Fuchs’ dystrophy, congenital glaucoma, end-stage glaucoma and limbal stem cell deficiency. Ten of 14 eyes had concomitant surgery, including intraocular lens removal (6), pars plana vitrectomy (PPVx, 5), silicone oil fill (2 for hypotony), Ahmed tube placement (2), pupilloplasty (1) and tarsorrhaphy(1). The median time from KPro placement to occurrence of RD was 9 months (range 0.5-40 months). Thirteen of 14 (92.9%) eyes underwent PPVx; only 3 eyes required KPro removal during RD repair. BCVA prior to KPro surgery was 1.91±0.28 (logarithm of minimum angle of resolution ± standard deviation). BCVA improved after KPro to 1.23±0.58 (p<0.001), but decreased after RD to 2.08±0.31. Ten of 13 eyes (77%) undergoing PPVx for RD achieved initial reattachment. Best BCVA post-repair was 2.02±0.75 overall (p=0.77), and 1.81±0.69 for eyes with successfully attached retinas. (p=0.45) However, 7 of these 10 eyes (70%) developed recurrent RDs and required a median of 2 PPVxs. Complications after KPro identified as contributing to RD included proliferative vitreoretinopathy (7), retroprosthetic membranes (7), hypotony (4), epithelial downgrowth (3), endophthalmitis (3), and choroidal detachment (3). BCVA at final follow-up was 2.19±0.80; 2 of the 14 eyes achieved VA > 20/400 at final follow up.

Conclusions: RD is a significant complication after KPro surgery occurring in 14.7% of 95 eyes. The visual acuity gain after KPro surgery is lost when a retinal detachment occurs, despite good anatomic outcomes in a majority of eyes (77%) after RD repair. Various ocular coexisting co-morbidities and post-KPro complications contributed to RDs and decreased visual acuity.

Keywords: 575 keratoprostheses  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×