June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Glaucoma alters rapid contrast adaptation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jia Jia Lek
    Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Algis Vingrys
    Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Allison McKendrick
    Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Jia Jia Lek, None; Algis Vingrys, None; Allison McKendrick, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 3964. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jia Jia Lek, Algis Vingrys, Allison McKendrick; Glaucoma alters rapid contrast adaptation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):3964.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: The visual system quickly and efficiently adapts to changes in contrast, often with changes in fixation. The neurobiological mechanisms underpinning contrast adaptation are located at multiple sites within the visual pathways, with a key site at the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dendrites. Early degenerative changes to RGC dendrites are a feature of glaucoma; hence we hypothesised that functional measures of contrast adaptation may be abnormal early in the disease. This study investigates if the magnitude and timecourse of recovery due to fast contrast adaptation is altered in glaucoma using a contrast detection task. We also explored whether facilitation and masking adaptation effects on contrast discrimination are altered in glaucoma.

Methods: 15 people with glaucoma (mean age±SD: 66yrs±7) and 17 controls (62yrs±6), all with normal standard automated perimetry (SAP) measures within the central 4° participated. Central contrast detection and discrimination thresholds were measured for briefly presented (94ms) Gabor patches (1°x1°, 2cpd) with and without adaptation to patterns (1s, 2cpd, 50%contrast). The magnitude and timecourse of detection threshold elevation post-adaptation was assessed for varying interstimulus intervals (ISI: 47, 106, 200, 400, 600, 1000ms) between the adaptor and target. The magnitude of discrimination threshold changes was assessed for varying contrast relationships using targets below (30%), equivalent (50%) or above (70%) the adaptor.

Results: Unadapted contrast detection (p<0.0001) and discrimination (p<0.0001) thresholds were elevated in the glaucoma group. Contrast detection thresholds (normalised to unadapted thresholds) of the glaucoma group were less affected by adaptation for ISIs: 47, 106, 200ms (p=0.02), returning to unadapted threshold earlier (~200ms) than controls (~400ms). Contrast discrimination data (normalised to unadapted thresholds) demonstrated similar between group facilitation effects for targets below (p= 0.3) and above (p=0.21) the adaptor. The glaucoma group showed less masking when the target was equivalent to the adaptor (p=0.023).

Conclusions: The glaucoma group demonstrated elevated macular contrast detection and discrimination thresholds without adaptation. Reduced adaptation effects in the form of masking immediately post-adaptor indicate altered fast contrast adaptation in glaucoma. These findings imply central vision abnormalities in natural visual experiences that are not captured by SAP.

Keywords: 409 adaptation: pattern • 478 contrast sensitivity  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.