June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Evaluation of the Validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Dry Eye in Japan Using Subjective Symptoms: Osaka Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Norihiko Yokoi
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Miki Uchino
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Yuichi Uchino
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • MURAT DOGRU
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Motoko Kawashima
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Aoi Komuro
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Yukiko Sonomura
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Hiroaki Kato
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Kazuo Tsubota
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Shigeru Kinoshita
    Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Norihiko Yokoi, Santen Pharmaceutical (F), Otsuka Pharmaceutical (F), Kowa (P), Kissei Pharmaceutical (C), Menicon (F), Alcon Japan (F), White medical (F), Nitten (F), Rohto (C), Nidek (F), Johson & Johnson (F); Miki Uchino, Santen Pharmaceutical Co (F); Yuichi Uchino, Santen Pharmaceutical (F); MURAT DOGRU, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals (F); Motoko Kawashima, Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (F); Aoi Komuro, Santen pharmaceutical (F); Yukiko Sonomura, Santen pharmaceutical (F); Hiroaki Kato, Santen Pharmaceutical (F); Kazuo Tsubota, AcuFocus, Inc (C), Allergan (F), Bausch Lomb Surgical (C), Functional visual acuity meter (P), JiNS (P), Kissei (F), Kowa (F), Santen, Inc. (F), Otsuka (F), Pfizer (C), Thea (C), Echo Denki (P), Nidek (F), Ophtecs (F), Wakasa Seikatsu (F), CEPT Company (P); Shigeru Kinoshita, Senju Pharmaceutical Co (P), Santen Pharmaceutical Co (P), Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co (C), Alcon (R), AMO (R), HOYA (R)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 4337. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Norihiko Yokoi, Miki Uchino, Yuichi Uchino, MURAT DOGRU, Motoko Kawashima, Aoi Komuro, Yukiko Sonomura, Hiroaki Kato, Kazuo Tsubota, Shigeru Kinoshita; Evaluation of the Validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Dry Eye in Japan Using Subjective Symptoms: Osaka Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):4337.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the validity of the diagnostic criteria for dry eye using subjective symptom scores.

Methods: This study involved 672 Japanese young and middle-aged office workers who use visual display terminals (VDT). The subjects completed questionnaires sent to them by e-mail designed to detect dry eye diagnosis and risk factors. Dry eye tests, including the Schirmer test, tear film breakup time (BUT), and fluorescein and lissamine green staining were then performed. In the questionnaire, the subjects answered the following questions in regard to subjective symptoms (each given a maximum of 4 points depending on severity): sensitivity of light, dryness, discomfort, redness, heavy eyelids, itchiness, blurred vision, tearing, foreign body sensation, discharge, pain, and eye fatigue. The Japanese dry eye diagnostic criteria, revised in 2006, was followed in this study.

Results: Of the 672 subjects, 561 (374 males, 187 females) completed the questionnaire (response rate: 83.5%). Sixty-five subjects (11.6%) were diagnosed as definite dry eye disease (DED), 303 subjects (54.0%) were diagnosed as suspected DED, and 193 subjects (34.4%) were diagnosed as non-DED. The mean subjective symptom scores of participants with suspected DED (2.05±0.42) and non-DED (1.63±0.38) were significantly less than definite DED (2.19±0.40) (p<0.05). In participants with suspected DED, a subgroup with subjective symptoms and abnormal tear film BUT (<=5 sec.) had a high score (2.09±0.40) equivalent to that of those with definite DED (p=0.269).

Conclusions: The validity of the criteria was confirmed in terms of subjective symptoms. However, suspected DED with abnormal tear film BUT and positive subjective symptoms showed equivalent severity of subjective symptoms of definite DED, and from this result, the importance of examining tear film BUT and the necessity of treatment for this group was indicated.

Keywords: 486 cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye • 463 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: prevalence/incidence  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×