June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Ahmed Glaucoma Valve versus Gold Micro Shunt (GMS) implants - Five years Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Iris Moroz
    Goldschleger Eye Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  • Shlomo Melamed
    Goldschleger Eye Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  • Oded Sagiv
    Goldschleger Eye Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  • Guy Ben Simon
    Goldschleger Eye Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  • Modi Goldenfeld
    Goldschleger Eye Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  • Alon Skaat
    Goldschleger Eye Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Iris Moroz, None; Shlomo Melamed, Solx (F), Eyetechcare (F), Ioptima (F), Allergan (F); Oded Sagiv, SOLX Ltd, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (F); Guy Ben Simon, None; Modi Goldenfeld, None; Alon Skaat, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 4745. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Iris Moroz, Shlomo Melamed, Oded Sagiv, Guy Ben Simon, Modi Goldenfeld, Alon Skaat; Ahmed Glaucoma Valve versus Gold Micro Shunt (GMS) implants - Five years Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):4745.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To report 5-year outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation Compared with the Gold Micro Shunt (GMS) implants (20µ GMS and 40µ GMS-Plus) in the treatment of refractory glaucoma.

Methods: Comparative prospective interventional clinical trial. A total of 32 eyes of 32 patients with refractory glaucoma were prospectively assigned to either AGV or GMS implantation. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon at the Glaucoma Service of Goldschleger Eye Institute between January 2006 and July 2007. Kaplan-Meier survival with success defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 5 mmHg and < 22 mmHg and at least 20% reduction from preoperative IOP (with or without antiglaucoma medications). Secondary outcome measures included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications and comparison between 20µ GMS and 40µ GMS-Plus subgroups.

Results: At the end of the follow up period, the AGV group had a significantly reduced final mean IOP of 17.3 ± 1.7 mmHg (vs. pre IOP of 33.5± 4.1 mmHg, P = 0.004) - a reduction of a mean 16.1± 4.0 mmHg, without a significant change in the final mean number of 2 ± 0.5 medications (vs. 2.5±0.4 pre-op, P = 0.43). The GMS group had a significantly reduced final mean IOP of 20.2 ± 1.8 mmHg (vs. pre IOP of 31.1± 1.2 mmHg, P = 0.0001) - a reduction of a mean 10.9± 2.2 mmHg, without a significant change in the final mean number of 2.6 ± 1.5 medications (vs. 3.0±0.2 pre-op, P = 0.24). The cumulative successes for the AGV group was 0.78 and for the GMS group was 0.67 with a similar rate of success based on the Kaplan-Meier survival functions (P = 0.83).

Conclusions: No difference was shown in the success rate between the AGV and GMS during 5 years of prospective follow-up. Both procedures were associated with similar IOP reduction and use of supplemental medical therapy at 5 years.

Keywords: 568 intraocular pressure • 455 ciliary body  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×