June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
In Vivo Structure of the Schlemm’s Canal and the Collector Channels in Eyes with Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma Compared to Normal Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Camila Netto
    Moise and Chella Safra Advanced Ocular Imaging Laboratory, Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Sung Chul Park
    Moise and Chella Safra Advanced Ocular Imaging Laboratory, Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
    Department of Ophthalmology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
  • Wendy Kirkland
    Moise and Chella Safra Advanced Ocular Imaging Laboratory, Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Rafael Furlanetto
    Moise and Chella Safra Advanced Ocular Imaging Laboratory, Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Yiyi Liu
    Moise and Chella Safra Advanced Ocular Imaging Laboratory, Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
    New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
  • Jeffrey Liebmann
    Moise and Chella Safra Advanced Ocular Imaging Laboratory, Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
    Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • Robert Ritch
    Moise and Chella Safra Advanced Ocular Imaging Laboratory, Einhorn Clinical Research Center, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
    Department of Ophthalmology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Camila Netto, None; Sung Chul Park, None; Wendy Kirkland, None; Rafael Furlanetto, None; Yiyi Liu, None; Jeffrey Liebmann, Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (C), Allergan, Inc. (C), Allergan, Inc. (F), Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc (F), Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH (F), Topcon Medical Systems, Inc. (F), National Eye Institute (F), New York Glaucoma Research Institute (F), SOLX, Inc. (C), Bausch & Lomb, Inc (C), Diopsys, Inc. (C), Diopsys, Inc. (F), Merz, Inc. (C), Glaukos, Inc. (C), Quark, Inc. (C); Robert Ritch, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 4823. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Camila Netto, Sung Chul Park, Wendy Kirkland, Rafael Furlanetto, Yiyi Liu, Jeffrey Liebmann, Robert Ritch; In Vivo Structure of the Schlemm’s Canal and the Collector Channels in Eyes with Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma Compared to Normal Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):4823.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

To characterize in vivo structure of the Schlemm’s canal (SC) and the collector channels (CC) in eyes with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) compared to normal eyes.

 
Methods
 

Serial horizontal enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI OCT) B-scans were obtained in the nasal and temporal limbal areas from CACG patients and normal subjects (81 scans per 15x5 degree rectangle; interval between scans, ~35 µm; Fig A and B). The cross-sectional area of the SC was measured in each EDI OCT B-scan (Fig C). After three-dimensional SC reconstruction, SC volume was calculated for each eye. The CCs connected to SC (Fig D) were counted.

 
Results
 

Nine CACG eyes (9 patients; mean age, 72±10 years) and 11 normal eyes (11 subjects; mean age, 28±5 years) were included. In CACG eyes, the SC and CC were mostly obliterated in the areas with high peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS; Fig E) and were mostly open but smaller than those in normal eyes in the areas with no or low PAS (Fig F). The mean cross-sectional SC area was significantly smaller in the CACG than in the normal eyes (863±611 µm2 vs. 3512±1228 µm2; p<0.001; Fig G), as was the SC volume (0.005±0.003 mm3 vs. 0.020±0.006 mm3; p<0.001). The number of the CCs was significantly smaller in the CACG than in the normal eyes (2.3±1.3 vs. 6.5±1.6; p<0.001; Fig H).

 
Conclusions
 

SC appears smaller and connected to fewer open CCs in CACG eyes than in normal eyes. In CACG eyes, circumferential aqueous flow is compromised in areas with high PAS.

 
 
(A) 15x5 degree rectangle for 81 serial horizontal EDI OCT B-scans. (B) A horizontal EDI OCT B-scan of the limbus and sclera (red arrow = Schlemm’s canal [SC]). (C) SC was delineated (red dotted line) to measure its cross-sectional area (asterisk = scleral spur). (D) Yellow arrows = collector channel. (E) Obliterated SC (red arrows). (F) Open but small SC (red arrows) and CC (yellow arrows). (G and H) Box-and-whisker plot for the SC area and the number of collector channels in the CACG and the normal eyes.
 
(A) 15x5 degree rectangle for 81 serial horizontal EDI OCT B-scans. (B) A horizontal EDI OCT B-scan of the limbus and sclera (red arrow = Schlemm’s canal [SC]). (C) SC was delineated (red dotted line) to measure its cross-sectional area (asterisk = scleral spur). (D) Yellow arrows = collector channel. (E) Obliterated SC (red arrows). (F) Open but small SC (red arrows) and CC (yellow arrows). (G and H) Box-and-whisker plot for the SC area and the number of collector channels in the CACG and the normal eyes.
 
Keywords: 419 anatomy • 421 anterior segment • 552 imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound)  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×