June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
A novel alignment and subtraction technique for the detection of glaucoma progression
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Elizabeth Marlow
    New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Margaret McGlynn
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Nathan Radcliffe
    Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Elizabeth Marlow, None; Margaret McGlynn, None; Nathan Radcliffe, Allergan Inc (C), Iridex (C), Alcon (C), Merge Healthcare (C), Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 4829. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elizabeth Marlow, Margaret McGlynn, Nathan Radcliffe; A novel alignment and subtraction technique for the detection of glaucoma progression. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):4829.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Identification of features of glaucoma progression informs clinical management. While flicker chronoscopy is useful, a dynamic view is not always possible. Auto-alignment and subtraction of serial optic nerve photos (ASSOP) was used to generate static representations of differences between baseline and follow-up images that may be valuable for identifying glaucomatous change.

 
Methods
 

Subtraction maps were generated from auto-aligned (EyeIC, Narbeth, PA) baseline and follow up images using Adobe Photoshop software. They demonstrate progressive retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects, optic disc hemorrhage (DH), neuroretinal rim loss (RL), and peripapillary atrophy (PPA). A masked glaucoma specialist identified features of progression on subtraction map first, then assessed feature strength by comparison with original images using flicker. Control images with no progression and parallax-only images were included.

 
Results
 

Seventy-six eyes of 71 patients were used to generate subtraction maps that detected glaucoma progression in 87% of DH (n=31, Sensitivity (Se) 84%, Specificity (Sp) 98%) and 84% of PPA (n=32, Se 81%, Sp 98%) cases. The lowest rates of detection were seen with RL (67%, n=31, Se 65%, Sp 98%). The subtraction technique was most sensitive for detecting parallax (41 of 40, Se 98%, Sp 94%). All features of glaucoma progression appeared equally strong in flicker and subtraction images. However, parallax was stronger in 13% of subtraction maps overall and in 50% of images containing RNFL defects in particular. Among control images selected for absence of features of glaucomatous change (n=11) in original flicker images, no features were detected on subtraction maps.

 
Conclusions
 

ASSOP reliably detects features of glaucoma progression with a single static image. Parallax identification may also be facilitated. Future investigations should determine an algorithm that can be uniformly applied to any set of temporally-spaced and aligned images to create a subtraction map yielding the highest quality visualization of change.

 
 
Figure 1. Baseline (A), follow-up (B) and subtraction image (C), demonstrating neuroretinal rim loss in both the follow up and subtraction images.
 
Figure 1. Baseline (A), follow-up (B) and subtraction image (C), demonstrating neuroretinal rim loss in both the follow up and subtraction images.
 
Keywords: 549 image processing • 551 imaging/image analysis: non-clinical  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×