June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Primary Scleral Buckling: A Safe and Effective Treatment Option for Retinal Detachment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Frank Ruda
    West Virginia University Eye Institute, Morgantown, WV
  • Adel Jirgis
    ForSight Foundation, Morgantown, WV
    National Eye Institute - Cairo, Cairo, Egypt
  • Nabil Jabbour
    West Virginia University Eye Institute, Morgantown, WV
    ForSight Foundation, Morgantown, WV
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Frank Ruda, None; Adel Jirgis, None; Nabil Jabbour, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 4954. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Frank Ruda, Adel Jirgis, Nabil Jabbour; Primary Scleral Buckling: A Safe and Effective Treatment Option for Retinal Detachment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):4954.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: To evaluate primary scleral buckling (SB) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) frequently treated with vitrectomy with or without SB.

Methods: Primary SB performed in the past 5 years on all RRD cases that don’t qualify for pneumatic retinopexy or have significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).

Results: 75 patients (eyes) underwent primary SB. 100% showed initial reattachment. 8 (11%) required additional treatment after 1 month (3 lasers and 5 buckle revisions). All 75 eyes remained reattached for the duration of follow up (average 12 M) with an average of 5.4 lines of improvement. 6 (8%) showed mild exposure requiring partial buckle removal (in the office). No other untoward effects or complications were encountered.

Conclusions: Primary SB without vitrectomy is a safe and effective treatment for many RRDs. It saves unnecessary complications and cost. Generations of vitreoretinal surgeons are being deprived of this effective therapy because of lack of exposure to it during their training. This deficiency affects the quality of SB, even as a secondary procedure.

Keywords: 697 retinal detachment  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.