June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Lipid Adherence to Model Contact Lens Materials
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Holly Lorentz
    Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • Giuliano Guidi
    Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • Lyndon Jones
    CCLR - School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • Heather Sheardown
    Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Holly Lorentz, None; Giuliano Guidi, None; Lyndon Jones, Alcon (F), Alcon (R), Allergan (F), Abbott Medical Optics (R), Bausch & Lomb (R), Ciba Vision (F), Ciba Vision (R), CooperVision (F), Johnson & Johnson (F), Johnson & Johnson (R); Heather Sheardown, Alcon (F), Alimera Sciences (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 512. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Holly Lorentz, Giuliano Guidi, Lyndon Jones, Heather Sheardown; Lipid Adherence to Model Contact Lens Materials. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):512.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of incorporating novel hydrophilic substances into silicone materials and their impact on cholesterol (CH) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) deposition using radiochemical analysis.

Methods: Thirteen model lens materials were created based on combinations of dimethylacrylamide (DMAA), hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and methacryloxypropyltris(trimethylsiloxy)silane (TRIS). The materials were prepared with and without the incorporation of a hydrophilic novel substance such as hyaluronic acid, alginate, and a silicone surfactant. The model materials were hydrated and advancing contact angles were measured using the sessile drop technique. All materials were incubated in a complex artificial tear solution (ATS) containing protein, lipid, mucin and a trace amount of either 14C-CH or 14C-PC for 3 and 14 days. All materials were then extracted, processed and masses of deposition were quantified (ng/disc) using standard calibration curves.

Results: For the HEMA-based materials tested, only the materials that incorporated the silicone surfactant and alginate showed a statistically significant increase in wettability (p<0.05) over the controls by decreasing the contact angle from 90.8° for the HEMA-TRIS control down to 12.7° for the surfactant HEMA-TRIS material and 60.9° the alginate HEMA-TRIS material. For the DMAA-TRIS materials only the silicone surfactant material showed an improvement in material wettability (p<0.001) with a contact change from 97.1 to 48.2°. For lipid deposition, the incubation time in the ATS had a significant impact on deposition (p ≤0.001) with the 14 day incubations depositing up to 3.4x more lipid than the 3 day incubations. No statistically significant decreases in deposition were seen for any material which incorporated the hydrophilic substance when compared with the controls. However, there were some statistically significant increases in CH and PC deposition (p<0.05) when compared to the corresponding controls, especially for the HEMA-TRIS surfactant containing materials.

Conclusions: Despite the incorporation of hydrophilic substances, such as hyaluronic acid, alginate, and silicone surfactants, into HEMA-TRIS and DMAA-TRIS materials, no reductions in CH and PC deposition were found.

Keywords: 477 contact lens • 583 lipids  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.