June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Efficacy of multi-purpose solutions in removing cholesterol deposits from silicone hydrogel contact lenses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hendrik Walther
    Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • Lakshman Subbaraman
    Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • Lyndon Jones
    Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Hendrik Walther, None; Lakshman Subbaraman, None; Lyndon Jones, Alcon (F), Alcon (R), Allergan (F), Abbott Medical Optics (R), Bausch & Lomb (R), Ciba Vision (F), Ciba Vision (R), CooperVision (F), Johnson & Johnson (F), Johnson & Johnson (R)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 517. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hendrik Walther, Lakshman Subbaraman, Lyndon Jones; Efficacy of multi-purpose solutions in removing cholesterol deposits from silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):517.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of saline and multi-purpose solutions (MPS) on the removal of cholesterol deposits from silicone hydrogel (SH) contact lens materials using an in vitro model.

Methods: Six SH lens materials: senofilcon A (Acuvue Oasys), comfilcon A (Biofinity), balafilcon A (Pure Vision2), lotrafilcon A (Air Optix® Night and Day Aqua), lotrafilcon B (Air Optix® Aqua) and lotrafilcon B toric (Air Optix® for Astigmatism) were removed from the blister pack (n=4 for each lens type), incubated for 7 days at 37°C in an artificial tear solution (ATS) containing 14-C radiolabeled cholesterol. Thereafter, lenses were cleaned with an unpreserved saline solution (Sensitive Eyes) or one of five MPS (Opti-Free® PureMoist, renu fresh, RevitaLens, Biotrue, SoloCare Aqua) using a rub and rinse technique, according to the manufacturer recommendations, and stored in the MPS for a minimum of six hours. Lenses were then extracted with 2:1 chloroform:methanol, analyzed in a beta counter and µg/lens of cholesterol was determined.

Results: Balafilcon A and senofilcon A showed the highest amounts of accumulated cholesterol (0.93±0.02µg/lens, 0.95±0.01µg/lens respectively), while lotrafilcon A and lotrafilcon B deposited the lowest amounts (0.37±0.03; 0.47±0.12). OptiFree PureMoist removed more cholesterol than the other solutions for all lens materials; however, the amount of cholesterol cleaned was statistically significant for balafilcon A and senofilcon A lens materials (p=0.006 and p=0.042). Sensitive Eyes and the other MPS evaluated showed no significant effect on lipid removal (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Lipid-removal efficacy varies depending on the combination of lens material and solution. Only one MPS showed a significant reduction of lipids for any of the lenses tested. It will be valuable to conduct further work to determine the efficacy of MPS in removing lipid deposits on worn lenses and how these deposits may impact subjective comfort.

Keywords: 477 contact lens  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×