June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
The Effect of AOSLO Image Distortion on Metrics of Mosaic Geometry
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Robert Cooper
    Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI
  • Zachary Harvey
    Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
  • Michael Dubow
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
    Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
  • Yusufu Sulai
    The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
  • Alexander Pinhas
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
    Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
  • Drew Scoles
    Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
  • Nishit Shah
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Richard Rosen
    New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY
  • Alfredo Dubra
    Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
    Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
  • Joseph Carroll
    Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
    Cell Biology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 5546. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Robert Cooper, Zachary Harvey, Michael Dubow, Yusufu Sulai, Alexander Pinhas, Drew Scoles, Nishit Shah, Richard Rosen, Alfredo Dubra, Joseph Carroll; The Effect of AOSLO Image Distortion on Metrics of Mosaic Geometry. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):5546.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopes (AOSLOs) permit near diffraction-limited imaging of the human photoreceptor mosaic, though intraframe eye movements lead to image distortion. Here, we explore the impact of these distortions on a number of metrics commonly used to characterize the photoreceptor mosaic.

Methods: We acquired 9 image sequences of the parafoveal cone mosaic from 7 subjects on 3 similar AOSLOs. In another subject, we acquired an AOSLO and flood-illuminated AO image sequences of the same retinal location. To assess the effect of distortions within AOSLO images, ten averaged images were produced by registering against different reference frames using a previously described algorithm. The images were then registered with the same software while tracking the distortion applied to each image. The photoreceptor coordinates from the reference frame were transformed using this distortion. Voronoi geometry, cone density, nearest-neighbor distance (NND), inter-cell spacing (ICS), and regularity index (RI) were calculated for each set of images. Repeatability was calculated to assess the effect of intraframe distortion on these metrics.

Results: Across the AOSLO images, we analyzed 17,942 cones, 75% of which retained the number of sides in the corresponding Voronoi domains across the 10 images (range 56%-90%). Cone density was found to have a repeatability of 1.8% (i.e., the difference between any 2 measurements on the same subject would be less than 1.8% for 95% of observations). NND and ICS had even better repeatability, at 1.4% and 0.95%, respectively. In contrast, the NND RI and ICS RI had a repeatability of 11% and 31%, respectively. Comparing an AOSLO image set to a flood-illuminated AO image, we found similar repeatability (density: 2.7%, NND: 0.7%, ICS: 0.83%, NND RI: 8.9%, ICS RI: 20.3%) and 83% of cells had retained Voronoi geometry.

Conclusions: Global metrics (density and cell spacing) are minimally affected by intraframe distortions, whereas local metrics (regularity index and Voronoi geometry) are more significantly affected. Intraframe distortion in AO scanning instruments limits the measurement accuracy of mosaic geometry, thus every effort should be made to choose minimally distorted reference frames.

Keywords: 549 image processing • 648 photoreceptors • 522 eye movements  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×