June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
COMPARATIVE AGREEMENT AMONG THREE METHODS OF TONOMETRY: GOLDMANN APPLANATION, TRANSPALPEBRAL, AND DYNAMIC CONTOUR
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • LUIS ZARATE
    GLAUCOMA, ASOCIACION PARA EVITAR LA CEGUERA EN MEXICO, Mexico, Mexico
  • Magdalena García-Huerta
    GLAUCOMA, ASOCIACION PARA EVITAR LA CEGUERA EN MEXICO, Mexico, Mexico
  • Rafael Castañeda Diez
    GLAUCOMA, ASOCIACION PARA EVITAR LA CEGUERA EN MEXICO, Mexico, Mexico
  • Mauricio Turati
    GLAUCOMA, ASOCIACION PARA EVITAR LA CEGUERA EN MEXICO, Mexico, Mexico
  • Felix Gil Carrasco
    GLAUCOMA, ASOCIACION PARA EVITAR LA CEGUERA EN MEXICO, Mexico, Mexico
  • Jesus Jimenez-Roman
    GLAUCOMA, ASOCIACION PARA EVITAR LA CEGUERA EN MEXICO, Mexico, Mexico
  • Jose Paczka
    Glaucoma, 3. Asistencia e Investigacion en Glaucoma, A.C, Guadalajara, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships LUIS ZARATE, None; Magdalena García-Huerta, None; Rafael Castañeda Diez, None; Mauricio Turati, None; Felix Gil Carrasco, None; Jesus Jimenez-Roman, None; Jose Paczka, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 5660. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      LUIS ZARATE, Magdalena García-Huerta, Rafael Castañeda Diez, Mauricio Turati, Felix Gil Carrasco, Jesus Jimenez-Roman, Jose Paczka; COMPARATIVE AGREEMENT AMONG THREE METHODS OF TONOMETRY: GOLDMANN APPLANATION, TRANSPALPEBRAL, AND DYNAMIC CONTOUR. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):5660.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), and Diaton transpalpebral tonometer (DTT).

Methods: Device agreement was calculated by Bland-Altman analysis in 77 eyes of 40 individuals (mean age 58.9 ± 13 years) with a mixed diagnosis of glaucoma suspicion and primary open-angle glaucoma. All measurements were performed in a random order by the same clinician according to standard procedures.

Results: Mean IOPs ± S.D. were 14.4 ± 2.9 mm Hg (GAT), 18.8 ± 3.2 mm Hg (DCT; P = 0.005, ANOVA), and 15.1 ± 3.1 mm Hg (DTT). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that, on average, DCT IOP measurements overestimated in approximately 3 mm Hg, values derived from GAT and DTT, although agreement was fairly good.

Conclusions: All methods of tonometry were adequate to measure IOP in our sample. Agreement among devices was considered good; nevertheless, DCT values of IOP were significantly higher as compared to the other two assessed methods.

Keywords: 465 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • 568 intraocular pressure  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×