June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Clinical testing of a new objective binocular refraction device
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lei Shi
    Center for Laser Applications, University of Tennessee Space Inst, Tullahoma, TN
  • Ying-Ling Chen
    Center for Laser Applications, University of Tennessee Space Inst, Tullahoma, TN
  • James Lewis
    E-Vision Technologies, Tullahoma, TN
  • Ming Wang
    Wang Vision Institute, Nashville, TN
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Lei Shi, None; Ying-Ling Chen, University of Tennessee Research Foundation (P), E-Vision Technologies (I); James Lewis, University of Tennessee Research Foundation (P), E-Vision Technologies (P); Ming Wang, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 5673. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lei Shi, Ying-Ling Chen, James Lewis, Ming Wang; Clinical testing of a new objective binocular refraction device. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):5673.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: Objective, non-cycloplegic, and binocular refraction measurements are the most important part of pediatric vision screening. Accuracies of current methods are strongly compromised by variations of pupil size, and intraocular scattering. This study evaluates a new device, the Dynamic Ocular Evaluation System (DOES) [US patents: 7,427,135 7,878,652] and the dependence of its accuracy on pupil size and age.

Methods: The DOES optical design uses infrared video photorefraction (PR) with multi-eccentricities and meridians. Subj: 71 patients of age 4 to 81 years were recruited. Hyperopic or mild myopic (SE>-1) subjects younger than 50 years old were excluded for possible error due to accommodation. DOES testing: In 2 room-lighting conditions, 8 measurements were acquired as the patient viewed a cartoon figure projected by a 3D screen at 4 distances (0.75, 1.5, 2.7, and >6 m); a 6-cm IPD was assumed. All patients received standard clinical refraction examinations. Accuracy evaluation: After eliminating images with technical faults (eye lids and saturation), 69 eyes of 35 patients of ages 8- 81 yielded 453 refraction data (n=453) for analysis. We used the Bland-Altman statistical method to evaluate agreement between DOES and the clinical gold standard measurements. The standard errors (σ) of the spherical equivalent (SE) and crossed cylinders (J0 and J45) were obtained. To examine the influence of intraocular scattering, σ were compared in three age groups; kids (8-13yrs, 18 eyes, SE=0.9±2.7D, n=142), adults (17-38yrs, 13 eyes, SE=1.5±3D, n=93), and older adults (41-81yrs, 38 eyes, SE=2.2±0.2D, n= 218). Pupil size influence was examined in 2 groups with pupil=6.37±0.83mm (age=17-22, n=49) and pupil=3.73±0.51mm (22-38yrs, n=44).

Results: The standard errors for DOES refraction measurements of SE, J0, and J45 are 0.47, 0.3 and 0.17 D, respectively. σ_SE in the 3 age groups are 0.49, 0.44, and 0.47 D. In the 2 pupil groups σ_SE =0.55 and 0.28D.

Conclusions: Between -3 and +2D, the region of concern for referrals, the device shows outstanding binocular refractive error performance with σ_SE =0.42D (n=297), while across the full-range of age 8-81 and pupil of 2.5-8.3mm, σ_SE =0.47D (n=453). Large pupils appear to correlate with larger error. No discrimination among age groups was found, which indicates the effectiveness of DOES in calibrating individual intraocular scattering.

Keywords: 417 amblyopia • 434 binocular vision/stereopsis • 676 refraction  

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.