June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Down Syndrome and Accommodation: The Added Advantage of Bifocals
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Brinda Muthusamy
    Pediatric Ophthalmology & Adult Strabismus, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
  • Rohit Adyanthaya
    Pediatric Ophthalmology & Adult Strabismus, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
  • Sheena Isenor
    Pediatric Ophthalmology & Adult Strabismus, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
  • Kristina Irsch
    Pediatric Ophthalmology & Adult Strabismus, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
  • Kathryn Klein
    Pediatric Ophthalmology & Adult Strabismus, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
  • David Guyton
    Pediatric Ophthalmology & Adult Strabismus, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Brinda Muthusamy, None; Rohit Adyanthaya, None; Sheena Isenor, None; Kristina Irsch, None; Kathryn Klein, None; David Guyton, Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Inst (S), U.S. 6,027,216 - Rebiscan (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 5684. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brinda Muthusamy, Rohit Adyanthaya, Sheena Isenor, Kristina Irsch, Kathryn Klein, David Guyton; Down Syndrome and Accommodation: The Added Advantage of Bifocals. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):5684.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Traditionally most children with Down syndrome have been non-compliant with spectacle wear, often attributed to their inability to cooperate. Recent studies have documented that approximately 80-92% of children with Down syndrome have reduced accommodation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of bifocals increased spectacle compliance in these children.

Methods: Records from 1983 to 2007 were retrospectively reviewed of 86 Down syndrome children who were prescribed either bifocals with +3.00 D high flat-top adds or single vision spectacles (“non-bifocal” children). Compliance with spectacle wear was assessed by telephone and was available for 59 children: 33 with bifocals and 26 with single vision spectacles. Accommodative ability had been assessed by dynamic retinoscopy in 44 of these children.

Results: In the 33 bifocal children, all had poor accommodation on dynamic retinoscopy. Only 11 of the 26 non-bifocal children had dynamic retinoscopy (9 had good accommodation and 2 had poor accommodation). Of the 33 non-bifocal children, 28 were compliant with spectacle wear (84.8%), while only 12 of the 26 non-bifocal children were compliant (46.2%). This association between type of spectacle prescribed and compliance with wear was statistically significant by chi square testing (p value = 0.002). Even among the 9 non-bifocal children with known good accommodation, the compliance was only 44%, indicating that children with Down syndrome have inherent difficulties with single vision spectacles.

Conclusions: Our study provides evidence that the extra spectacle power for near is appreciated, and improves compliance of spectacle wear in these children. Dynamic retinoscopy helps identify children with poor accommodation. Improved spectacle compliance will likely aid management of strabismus and amblyopia that is common in these children.

Keywords: 404 accommodation • 676 refraction • 677 refractive error development  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×