June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
The Effect of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Epiretinal Membrane Including Pseudolamellar Macular Hole
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jung Min Park
    Ophthalmology, Maryknoll hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • Shin Yeop Oh
    Ophthalmology, Maryknoll hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • Soo Jung Lee
    Ophthalmology, Haeundae paek hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 5764. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jung Min Park, Shin Yeop Oh, Soo Jung Lee; The Effect of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Epiretinal Membrane Including Pseudolamellar Macular Hole. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):5764.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To report the effect and visual improvement of internal limiting membrane(ILM) peeling, and epiretinal membrane(ERM) peeling in symptomatic epiretinal membrane with pseudolamellar macular hole.

Methods: Twenty seven eyes in 26 consecutive patients with ERM including pseudolamellar macular hole underwent a vitrectomy, ERM peeling, intravitreal gas tamponade and maintain a face-down position for 7 days. ILM peeling was performed only thirteen eyes in 13 patients. The patients were divided into two groups: eyes with(14 eyes) or without(13 eyes) ILM peeling and the follow-up period was 12 months or more in all cases. The postoperative anatomic results by Optical Coherence Tomography(OCT) and improvement of best corrected visual acuity(BCVA) were retrospectively compared in two groups.

Results: Anatomic closure after the surgery was achieved in 11 eyes(78.6%) of the non ILM peeling group and in 12 eyes(92.3%) of the ILM peeling group(p=0.596). The BCVA improved from 0.41±0.31(logMAR) to 0.33±0.21 in non ILM peeling group(p=0.479) and from 0.46±0.41(logMAR) to 0.28±0.25 in ILM peeling group(p=0.001).

Conclusions: The additional ILM peeling is an effective technique in BCVA improvement of ERM with pseudolamellar macular hole. Vitrectomy, ERM peeling, Gas tamponade and ILM peeling were significant for anatomic and functional success in the ERM with pseudolamellar macular hole.

Keywords: 762 vitreoretinal surgery • 585 macula/fovea  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×