June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
A Comparison of Heidelberg and Zeiss OCT Imaging in Common Laboratory Animals: Retinal Cell Layer Definition and Correlation to Histopathology
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Margaret Collins
    Toxicology, Charles River, Reno, NV
  • William Culp
    Technical Operations, Charles River, Reno, NV
  • Kelly Tenneson
    Ocular and Neuroscience, Charles River, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Sylvie Wise
    Ocular and Neuroscience, Charles River, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Mark Vezina
    Ocular and Neuroscience, Charles River, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Margaret Collins, Chalres River Laboratories (E); William Culp, Charles River Labs (E); Kelly Tenneson, Charles River (E), Eleven Biotherapeutics (E); Sylvie Wise, Charles River (E); Mark Vezina, Charles River Laboratories (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 5829. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Margaret Collins, William Culp, Kelly Tenneson, Sylvie Wise, Mark Vezina; A Comparison of Heidelberg and Zeiss OCT Imaging in Common Laboratory Animals: Retinal Cell Layer Definition and Correlation to Histopathology. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):5829.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: The use of OCT is gaining popularity as a non-invasive tool for retinal evaluation in preclinical studies, both for ocular therapeutics as well as non-ocular indications where adverse ocular side effects may be a concern. This poster presents OCT images of normal eyes from the Heidelberg Spectralis and Zeiss Cirrus systems in 4 laboratory animal species, with an evaluation of quality of retinal cell layer definition and histopathology correlates.

Methods: Retina images were collected for non-human primate, dog, rat and rabbit on each system. Animals were sedated for all imaging sessions; a mydriatic was used to dilate the pupil. For the Cirrus system, macular cube was used as the scan type. For the Spectralis system, volume scans or individual scans were used. Images were compared for clarity of retinal layers and correlation with H&E stained histopathology sections.

Results: Both systems provided high resolution retinal cross sections in all 4 species with the ability to measure overall retinal thickness or the thickness of individual retinal layers. The anatomical orientation of the retinal layers correlated well with histopathology and published literature on human eyes. The significant size difference between human eyes and the animal eyes images did not impede obtaining high quality, interpretable images in eyes as small as rats with these clinical instruments.

Conclusions: Each platform provides the ability to image and analyze retinal layers in NHP, dogs, rabbits and rats that is comparable in quality to the human imaging. Applications for preclinical drug development include the ability to detect retinal thinning or detachment without having to euthanize the animal and to potentially detect retinal lesions before they are apparent clinically. Changes in the vitreous (e.g. deposits, vitreous detachment) can also be imaged.

Keywords: 551 imaging/image analysis: non-clinical • 688 retina • 552 imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound)  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×