June 2013
Volume 54, Issue 15
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2013
Through-thickness variation of human scleral strains in response to IOP elevation measured by ultrasound speckle tracking
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jun Liu
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
    Department of Ophthalmology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Junhua Tang
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Richard Hart
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Cynthia Roberts
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
    Department of Ophthalmology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Paul Weber
    Department of Ophthalmology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Xueliang Pan
    Center for Biostatistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships Jun Liu, None; Junhua Tang, None; Richard Hart, None; Cynthia Roberts, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH (C), Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG (C), Sooft Italia (R), Carl Zeiss Meditec (F); Paul Weber, None; Xueliang Pan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2013, Vol.54, 77. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jun Liu, Junhua Tang, Richard Hart, Cynthia Roberts, Paul Weber, Xueliang Pan; Through-thickness variation of human scleral strains in response to IOP elevation measured by ultrasound speckle tracking. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54(15):77.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose
 

Scleral mechanical properties are important factors influencing the mechanical states of the optic nerve head (ONH). This study aimed to examine the through-thickness variations of strains experienced by human posterior sclera during intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations.

 
Methods
 

Eleven human globes from 7 donors (age from 57 to 73 yo) were tested. Scleral shells were prepared and mounted onto a custom-built inflation chamber. An ultrasound probe (55MHz, Vevo660, Visualsonics) was employed to acquire 2 cross-sectional scans of the posterior sclera near the ONH along the meridian and circumferential directions. Prior to measurements, each globe was preconditioned with 5 cycles of inflation from 5 to 45 mmHg in 60 seconds. Six minutes were allowed for recovery. IOP was then gradually increased from 5 to 45 mmHg at steps of 2.5 or 5 mmHg and the ultrasound radiofrequency signals were acquired at each step. The tangential strains were calculated using a speckle tracking algorithm described previously (Tang & Liu, J Biomech Eng 2012, 134(9)). Each scleral cross-section was divided into three layers (outer, middle and inner) with equal thickness, and the average strains within each layer was calculated and compared.

 
Results
 

The average tangential strains in the outer layer were 0.20±0.08%, 0.30±0.11%, 0.35±0.13%, and 0.40±0.13% in the outer layer, 0.21±0.10%, 0.36±0.13%, 0.44±0.13%, and 0.52±0.13% in the middle layer, and 0.21±0.12%, 0.38±0.17%, 0.47±0.20%, and 0.56±0.23% in the inner layer, at pressures of 15, 25, 35 and 45 mmHg, respectively. Consistently lower tangential strains were found in the outer layer than either the inner or middle layer at pressure levels of 30, 35, 40, and 45 mmHg (all P's <0.05, paired t-tests, Fig.1).

 
Conclusions
 

Although tangential strains were small (<0.6%) in average within the physiological range of IOP (< 45 mmHg), significant through-thickness variations were found in the human posterior sclera. This result suggests the need to examine the strains throughout the thickness in order to fully characterize the sclera’s response to IOP elevations. The implications and underlying mechanisms of larger strains observed in the inner layers of the sclera need further investigations.

  
Keywords: 568 intraocular pressure • 708 sclera • 552 imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound)  
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×