May 1981
Volume 20, Issue 5
Articles  |   May 1981
Extraocular muscle forces in normal human subjects.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 1981, Vol.20, 652-664. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C C Collins, M R Carlson, A B Scott, A Jampolsky; Extraocular muscle forces in normal human subjects.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1981;20(5):652-664.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.

Actively developed horizontal muscle forces and tissue stiffnesses were measured in 29 normal orthophoric volunteer subjects (18 to 33 years old) by means of noninvasive length-tension forceps. Mean active fixation force developed at 50 deg extreme gaze was 26% greater for the medial rectus (74.8 gm) than for the lateral rectus (59.1 gm). The variation of maximum active force among individuals was 2:1 (48 to 103 gm). These muscles developed up to 25% of their maximum active force out of their field of action. Active (counter) hysteresis force differences of over 10 gm were measured between nasal and temporal gaze directions. This study suggests that a muscle which develops a maximum active force of less than 45 gm would be suspect as paretic. Variations from the normal pattern of reciprocal innervation, reflected in the graded active force of individual muscle contraction, may help in understanding some types of oculomotor pathology. The mean tissue stiffness-restraining movement of the globe in the nasal direction (1.05 gm/deg) is 11% greater than in the temporal direction (0.94 gm/deg). This is consistent with a stronger medial rectus balanced by a greater load. Variation of stiffness of 2:1 was observed among individuals; 0.8 to 1.7 gm/deg pulling nasally and 0.77 to 1.2 gm/deg temporally. Passive hysteresis and viscous force differences of over 10 gm were observed between the passive forced pull and normal spring-return of the eye. Large stiffnesses may be normal if balanced by large active forces. Abrupt changes of the length-tension curve indicate the magnitude and location of restrictions.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.