July 1990
Volume 31, Issue 7
Free
Articles  |   July 1990
Humidity effects on corneal hydration.
Author Affiliations
  • S R Cohen
    University of California, School of Optometry, Berkeley 94720.
  • K A Polse
    University of California, School of Optometry, Berkeley 94720.
  • R J Brand
    University of California, School of Optometry, Berkeley 94720.
  • R B Mandell
    University of California, School of Optometry, Berkeley 94720.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 1990, Vol.31, 1282-1287. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S R Cohen, K A Polse, R J Brand, R B Mandell; Humidity effects on corneal hydration.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1990;31(7):1282-1287.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Abstract

Overall corneal hydration control expressed as the percent recovery per hour (PRPH) can be assessed with an exponential model that uses data derived from two kinds of corneal thickness measurements; one from monitoring recovery after inducing corneal swelling, and the other from measurements made after the eye has been open long enough to reach its open-eye steady-state (OESS) corneal thickness. Up to now these thickness measurements have been made without controlling the ambient humidity. It is possible that changes in relative humidity may effect tear film osmolarity sufficiently to change the state of corneal hydration. To evaluate the effects of humidity on hydration control, the OESS and PRPH were determined under several humidity levels. For both the OESS and the PRPH, two substudies were conducted. For the OESS, substudy 1 consisted of measuring corneal thickness when humidity was changed from 30% (ambient) to 52 or 97% controlled humidity. This resulted in mean +/- standard deviation (SD) changes in OESS thickness amounting to -0.33 +/- 3.5 microns and 2.6 +/- 3.4 microns, respectively, with a differential change of 2.94 +/- 3.04 microns (95% confidence interval [CI] from 0.77 to 5.11 microns). Corresponding results for substudy 2 connected with changes from 43% (ambient) to 12 or 97% controlled humidity were -2.4 +/- 2.7 microns and -0.3 +/- 1.9 microns, respectively, with a differential change of 2.1 +/- 1.8 microns (95% CI from 0.9 to 3.4 microns).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×