November 1990
Volume 31, Issue 11
Free
Articles  |   November 1990
Shedding of rod outer segments is light-driven in goldfish.
Author Affiliations
  • C J Bassi
    Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • M K Powers
    Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science November 1990, Vol.31, 2314-2319. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C J Bassi, M K Powers; Shedding of rod outer segments is light-driven in goldfish.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1990;31(11):2314-2319.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Abstract

Rod outer segment (ROS) shedding in goldfish was quantified by measuring the number of phagosomes in the retinas of goldfish that were maintained under natural or artificial cyclic light, constant light, or constant dark conditions. Fish maintained in cyclic light, whether natural or artificial, had robust daily rhythms of ROS shedding. The ROS tips were shed primarily during the light phase of the cycle, and maximum shedding occurred 2-4 hours into the light period. Fish maintained for 1, 3, or 7 days in constant light or constant dark had no daily rhythms in ROS shedding. In these fish, ROSs lengthened, on average, 2.3 microns/day in constant light and 1.5 microns/day in constant dark. After 3 days in constant light, shedding was induced by placing fish in darkness for 2 hours, then returning them to light. Placing fish in darkness for 0.5 hours did not induce shedding, nor did placing them in darkness for 3 hours without returning them to light. ROS shedding thus appears to be goldfish is completely dependent on changes in ambient illumination; no circadian or endogenous components were found. Previous observations of circadian changes in behavioral visual sensitivity therefore cannot be due to endogenous changes in ROS length.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×