October 1998
Volume 39, Issue 11
Free
Articles  |   October 1998
Two pore types in the inner-wall endothelium of Schlemm's canal.
Author Affiliations
  • C R Ethier
    Department of Mechanical Engineering and Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • F M Coloma
    Department of Mechanical Engineering and Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • A J Sit
    Department of Mechanical Engineering and Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • M Johnson
    Department of Mechanical Engineering and Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science October 1998, Vol.39, 2041-2048. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C R Ethier, F M Coloma, A J Sit, M Johnson; Two pore types in the inner-wall endothelium of Schlemm's canal.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1998;39(11):2041-2048.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Abstract

PURPOSE: It has been reported that fixation conditions significantly influence the apparent pore density in the inner-wall endothelium of Schlemm's canal. In the present study, the manner in which fixation conditions affect the two subtypes of inner-wall pores, intracellular pores and intercellular (or border) pores, was investigated. METHODS: Outflow facility was measured in enucleated human eyes. Eyes were fixed under constant flow" or constant pressure conditions, microdissected to expose the inner wall of Schlemm's canal, and prepared for scanning electron microscopy. The density and diameter of the two subtypes of pores in the inner wall were measured. RESULTS: Intracellular pore density decreased with increasing postmortem time (P < 0.001) and increased with increasing volume of fixative passed through the outflow pathway (P < 0.001), whereas border pore density showed no dependence on these parameters (P > 0.25 and P > 0.15, respectively). Border pore density increased with increasing fixation pressure (P < 0.005), even though intracellular pore density showed no such dependence (P > 0.4). No correlation was found between outflow facility and the predictions of Poiseuille's law, Sampson's law, or the funneling theory for the hydraulic conductivity of the intracellular pores (P > 0.35) or the border pores (P > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: The intracellular and border pores form two morphologically and functionally distinct populations in the inner wall of Schlemm's canal. The dependence of intracellular pore density on postmortem time and on volume of fixative passed through the outflow pathway suggests that these pores are artifacts of tissue fixation or processing conditions. That border pores do not depend on such conditions and that their presence is correlative with perfusion pressure suggests that this population may be nonartifactual. New histologic techniques for examining the inner wall of Schlemm's canal are necessary to determine the in vivo state of inner-wall pores and how they influence outflow facility.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×