April 1999
Volume 40, Issue 5
Free
Articles  |   April 1999
Cone signal contributions to electroretinograms [correction of electrograms] in dichromats and trichromats.
Author Affiliations
  • J Kremers
    Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
  • T Usui
    Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
  • H P Scholl
    Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
  • L T Sharpe
    Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 1999, Vol.40, 920-930. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J Kremers, T Usui, H P Scholl, L T Sharpe; Cone signal contributions to electroretinograms [correction of electrograms] in dichromats and trichromats.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999;40(5):920-930.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

PURPOSE: To find out how the different cone types contribute to the electroretinogram (ERG) by quantifying the contribution of the signal pathways originating in the long (L-) and the middle (M-) wavelength-sensitive cones to the total ERG response amplitude and phase. METHODS: ERG response amplitudes and phases were measured to cone-isolating stimuli and to different combinations of L- and M-cone modulation. Conditions were chosen to exclude any contribution of the short wavelength-sensitive (S-) cones. The sensitivity of the ERG to the L and the M cones was defined as the cone contrast gain. RESULTS: In the present paper, a model is provided that describes the ERG contrast gains and ERG thresholds in dichromats and color normal trichromats. For the X-chromosome-linked dichromats, the contrast gains of only one cone type (either the L or the M cones) sufficed to describe the ERG thresholds for all stimulus conditions. Data suggest that the M-cone contrast gains of protanopes are larger than the L-cone contrast gains of deuteranopes. The response thresholds of the trichromats are modeled by assuming a vector summation of signals originating in the L and the M cones. Their L- and M-cone contrast gains are close to a linear interpolation of the data obtained from the dichromats. Nearly all trichromats had larger L- than M-cone contrast gains. Data from a large population of trichromats were examined to study the individual variations in cone weightings and in the phases of the cone pathway responses. CONCLUSIONS: The data strongly suggest that the missing cone type in dichromats is replaced by the remaining cone type. The mean L-cone to M-cone weighting ratio in trichromats was found to be approximately 4:1. But there is a substantial interindividual variability between trichromats. The response phases of the L- and the M-cone pathways can be reliably quantified using the response phases to the cone-isolating stimuli or using a vector addition of L- and M-cone signals.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×