Although the data strongly suggest that the majority of
Fas
+ cells are T cells (either
CD4
+ or CD8
+), some cells
within monocyte and macrophage scatter profiles also expressed Fas. It
is conceivable, therefore, that Fas
+ monocytes
and neutrophils also undergo apoptosis. However, flow cytometric
analysis showed that apoptotic events occurred predominantly within the
scatter profile of T cells, which was confirmed by identifying the
CD3
+Annexin V
+ apoptotic
T-cell population
(Fig. 4B) . The role of Fas-FasL is still
controversial. Although there is compelling evidence that Fas-FasL is
protective within immunoprivileged sites, particularly the anterior
chamber of the eye,
6 Fas-FasL interactions may result in
exacerbation of inflammation and solid organ graft
rejection,
12 44 45 via possible FasL-mediated activation
of Fas
+ granulocytes, although interestingly not
Fas-dependent T-cell cytotoxicity.
45 In addition, as
intimated earlier, MMP cleavage, environment (i.e., presence of other
cytotoxic agents such as TNF), and cell type (unactivated T cells are
not responsive to sFasL-mediated apoptosis
34 ) are integral
as to whether sFasL remains proapoptotic.
34 35 Evidence
suggests that cleaved trimeric sFasL requires aggregation for
proapoptotic action. Therefore, as a protective response, sFasL is
downregulatory mainly so that circulating sFasL does not possess
devastating systemic consequences. Interestingly, in some samples we
have observed and confirmed on western blot analysis, MW of sFasL at
around 70 kDa, representing either aggregated sFasL or mFasL (data not
shown). What makes sFasL proapoptotic in aqueous samples is likely to
be secondary to both a function of local MMP activity as well as yet
undefined immune factors generated during sequestered inflammatory
response in addition to the underlying immunoregulatory environment,
all of which may alter signaling on receptor engagement (similar to
differential TNF effects
42 ). It is also possible that
within the aqueous other proteolytic activity as a result of
granulocyte infiltration and activation results in nonspecific cell
death and thus the release of active mFasL from killed cells, such as
iris epithelium. This in turn would represent a local protective
response by generating FasL to kill infiltrating activated
Fas
+ T cells. Potentially, therefore, one may
postulate that during AAU a critical balance, as a result of
constitutive FasL expression within the anterior chamber, exists
between Fas-dependent “activated” T-cell apoptosis attempting to
suppress the inflammatory response and a proinflammatory nonspecific
Fas-dependent granulocyte toxicity. These results in part strongly
support experimental evidence of immune regulation within the anterior
chamber of the eye during ocular inflammation, particularly with
respect to the observation, experimentally at least, that FasL-induced
apoptosis is necessary for corneal graft survival.
13