Images were acquired using an optical coherence tomography scanner
(Humphrey Instruments), which directed a beam of light in a horizontal
plane through the pupil. Each composite OCT image or scan consisted of
a linear array of 100 juxtaposed individual z-axis scans,
each with a depth of 2 mm. The thickness of each individual z-axis scan was 13 μm, and the separation between them
increased with the field of the image.
The length of the OCT scan line in the x–y plane could be
varied, ranging from 2.5 to 19 mm in air at a working distance of 43
mm. This represented a scanning angle of between 3° and 25°. For a
flat specimen, this results in an overestimate of thickness by a factor
of 1.00 to 1.024, respectively, at the lateral extremes of a scan. For
this reason, the shortest scans possible were used in the in vitro
studies, even though posterior pole specimens maintained the concavity
of the eye. For an emmetropic eye the system-corrected range for scan
length in the x–y plane of the retina was 1.13 to 9.08 mm.
The angular orientation of the scan line could also be controlled
within the x–y plane of the tissue examined. The device had
an internal fixation light visible to the patient but not on the
operator’s viewing screen. A second light, generated by a HeNe laser,
was seen on the viewing screen and could be moved under the control of
the operator to fall on any given retinal feature. The spatial
separation between this light and the ends of the scan line was stored
by the computer for each scan orientation. Thus, on repeat visits, if
the operator relocated the HeNe light over the original retinal
feature, subsequent scans would always be at the same location and
orientation. The acquisition time for each composite OCT image was 0.9
seconds, independent of scan length and orientation. The images
produced were dependent on the optical properties of tissues in the z-plane and underwent processing by the commercial software
into a logarithmic pseudocolor scale in which white, red, yellow,
green, blue, and black represented the range of signal intensity from
high to low. All scans obtained with this instrument were accompanied
by a digital image of the tissue recorded with the scan line
superimposed.
The power incident on the eye was constant throughout (750 μW).
Imaging began with crude focusing of the image on the operator’s
viewing screen. After this, the continuously scanning real-time OCT
image was centered on the computer screen and the focusing knob
adjusted by small increments until the image was at its brightest
throughout the tissue. The polarization setting was then varied for
each image set to optimize the signal intensity for the inner band,
because the outer band varied little with polarization. This was done
to maximize the contrast in signal intensity of the inner part of the
image and therefore the clarity of borders. Finally, the focusing knob
was readjusted, if necessary, according to the criteria described.
In vivo examinations were performed after pupillary dilation with 1%
tropicamide and 10% phenylephrine. To avoid degradation of images,
only scans with minimal eye movement were recorded for later analysis.
Internal fixation was used as far as possible, but external fixation
was occasionally necessary to scan peripheral lesions.
19 Subjects were asked to blink between acquired images to minimize
corneal drying, which may have caused both discomfort for the subject
and a degradation of the OCT image. Because the measurements of
interest in this study were all in the
z-plane and taken
from several individual
z-axis scans in each OCT image,
z-axis alignment software was not used.