The RDH5 mutations found in this study are likely
to be pathogenic. Both mutations were present homozygously in affected
individuals, in agreement with the recessive inheritance pattern. In
both families the mutations cosegregated with the disease. Finally,
results showed that the mutation Val264Gly changes a nonpolar residue
to a polar one, and the mutation Leu310GluVal converts a nonpolar
residue (Leu) into two residues, one negatively charged (Glu) and the
other nonpolar (Val).
Two previously reported
RDH5 mutations, Ser73Phe and
Gly238Trp, were found to have 90% lower enzymatic activity than the
wild-type enzyme in transfected COS-1 cells.
7 Although we
did not perform a similar analysis of the mutations, it is likely that
they also result in reduced enzyme activity. 11-
cis Retinol
dehydrogenase has two potential membrane-anchoring
domains.
11 The position of a highly conserved
cofactor-binding motif is located at residues 35 to 41, and a presumed
catalytic domain is located at residues 175 to 179.
11 Although residue Val264 is not within these domains, it is highly
conserved in the superfamily of short-chain reductase
dehydrogenases.
13 The second mutation we found affects
residue Leu310, which is located in a potential membrane-anchoring
domain.
11 Because this change alters two residues from
nonpolar to negative charged and polar, this mutant protein may not be
able to anchor to the membrane. Therefore, because the intracellular
localization or membrane topology of this protein may be altered, the
enzyme activity of the protein may decrease. However, because we did
not perform biochemical analysis of these mutant proteins, further
studies are needed to determine how the mutations affect the function
of
RDH5.
All the patients described in this study had similar clinical findings:
small white deposits at the level of the RPE, normal visual acuity,
full visual fields, and very slow dark adaptation. Because the patients
were aged 45 and 55 years, it is unlikely that their disease was
progressive. These clinical findings are similar to those previously
reported in which mutations in
RDH5 were
found.
7 8 Although the mutations found in
RDH5 cause fundus albipunctatus in both the present and previous
reports,
7 8 recently a white family with fundus
albipunctatus was reported to show no mutations in
RDH5. 14 Therefore, fundus albipunctatus may be
genetically heterogeneous.
The authors thank Kaorn Nakano and Sachiko Takiuchi for
technical assistance and Thaddeus P. Dryja and Terri L. McGee for
helpful discussions.