In their debriefing interviews, 15 of 25 subjects indicated that
they had slept well, despite the on and off light conditions at night.
Eight subjects said that they did not sleep well. The other 2 subjects
stated that they slept well when the lights were off, but not with
lights on.
The average of all individual IOP data in the 8-hour assigned sleep
period was 21.9 ± 0.5 mm Hg (mean ± SEM,
n = 25). It was significantly higher (
P < 0.001, paired
t-test) than the average IOP in the light/wake period
(20.4 ± 0.3 mm Hg), which contained 6 time points for the IOP
measurement. The profile of the IOP change is presented in
Figure 1 . Mean IOP showed a gradual change throughout the recording period,
including the two 1-hour light exposures in the assigned sleep period.
The trough of mean IOP appeared at 2130 (19.1 ± 0.3 mm Hg), and
the peak of mean IOP appeared at 0530 (22.6 ± 0.6 mm Hg). The
difference in IOP between the trough and peak was 3.5 ± 0.7 mm Hg
(
P < 0.001, paired
t-test,
n = 25). The mean IOP at 0330 was 22.4 ± 0.6 mm
Hg, also significantly higher (
P < 0.001) than the IOP
mean at 2130. During the assigned sleep period with two 1-hour light
exposures, IOP continued to increase. The average of IOP determined
under illumination at 0330 and 0530 (22.5 ± 0.5 mm Hg) was
significantly higher (
P < 0.05) than the average of
IOP determined under darkness at 2330 and 0130 (21.2 ± 0.6 mm
Hg). After the 8-hour assigned sleep period, mean IOP decreased in the
morning.
The profile of IOP change was very similar to the profile
previously seen in a group of young adults
1 who had
received no light exposures (
Fig. 1 , right). Student’s
t-test showed no difference (
P > 0.05) for
the nocturnal IOP elevations (from the IOP at either 1730 or 2130)
between these two groups at the 4 time points of IOP measurement in the
assigned sleep period. The magnitudes of IOP elevation in the present
study for the time periods of 2130 to 0530 and 2130 to 0330 were 8%
and 12%, respectively, less than those without light
exposures.
1 These small reductions were not statistically
significant. Measures of IOP changes by time also showed no difference
between the two groups of using the Mann–Whitney rank-sum test.