It is worth noting that four of the six different EC mutations that we
studied resulted in normal cyclase activity compared with the
wild-type. However, all patients related to
LCA1 displayed
the same phenotype, whatever the nature of the mutations they carried.
Consequently, we can speculate that these last mutations should have
deleterious consequences on protein activity in vivo. One explanation
could have been that these mutations might result in the inability of
the mutant protein to be activated by the guanylate cyclase–activating
proteins (GCAPs).
13 14 15 However, this hypothesis is
unlikely, because it has been demonstrated that the EC domain of
retGC-1 is not a critical region for the activation by
GCAPs.
16 17 Therefore, the most likely explanation is that
extracellular mutations might result in misfolding of the mutant
retGC-1 protein during biosynthesis and subsequent
degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Indeed, it has already
been shown that potentially functional mutant proteins can be
retained in the ER because of minor structural defects.
18 For instance, some patients with α
1-antitrypsin
deficiency produce mutant molecules that, although functionally intact,
are retained in the ER and degraded.
19 In fact, in a large
number of diseases, expressions of mutant proteins are targeted to the
ER and fail to reach their intended cellular location, often displaying
an ER storage phenotype with aggregated material accumulating in the
ER.
20 This situation has been well documented in cystic
fibrosis, in which the most common mutation in the
CFTR gene, ΔF508, leads to the disease, whereas the same mutation
introduced into a recombinant
CFTR channel does not abolish
the biologic activity.
21