Abstract
purpose. To assess the role of the transforming growth factor (TGF)β system in
formation of corneal haze after excimer laser photorefractive
keratectomy (PRK), levels of mRNAs for three TGFβ isoforms (TGFβ1,
TGFβ2, and TGFβ3), the TGFβ type II receptor (TβRII), and
extracellular matrix (ECM) genes including fibronectin (FN),
collagen I, collagen III, and collagen IV were measured in rat corneas.
methods. Corneas were graded for corneal haze at 0, 1.5, 7, 21, 42, and 91 days
after PRK. Total RNA was isolated from pooled corneas, and the levels
of mRNAs were measured using competition-based quantitative reverse
transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
results. Severe corneal haze developed by day 42 and persisted to day 91. Levels
of TGFβ1 mRNA were high in rat corneas before PRK and remained
relatively constant. In contrast, levels of TGFβ2 and TGFβ3 mRNAs
were very low in normal corneas, increased 300-fold and 25-fold,
respectively, on day 21, and remained elevated on day 91. Levels of
mRNA for TβRII increased, with a peak elevation of 50-fold on day 42
after PRK. Levels of mRNAs for ECM proteins also increased. Fibronectin
mRNA was nondetectable in normal corneas but rapidly increased to 675
copies/cell on day 7 and remained elevated to day 91. Collagen III mRNA
levels peaked on day 21 with a 700-fold increase compared with a very
low level of expression in normal cornea, and then decreased on day 91.
Expression of collagen I mRNA lagged expression of collagen III mRNA
and peaked at day 42 after PRK with a 1200-fold increase over normal
cornea. In contrast, mRNA for collagen α(1)IV, a major component in
basement membranes, remained relatively stable through day 21 and then
increased slightly on days 42 and 91.
conclusions. The synchronized increase in mRNA synthesis for both the TGFβ system
and key ECM genes supports the hypothesis that TGFβ is a key growth
factor promoting stromal haze formation in corneas after PRK and
suggests that limiting TGFβ system may reduce corneal scarring after
excimer laser ablation.
The potential use of the excimer laser keratectomy in
ophthalmology was first proposed in 1983.
1 It was
suggested that ablation of the anterior cornea surface could modify the
corneal profile, and thus induce a desired refractive change, remove
corneal scars, or smooth surface irregularities. However, complications
that may occur after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) include
subepithelial haze and regression of refractive effect.
2 3 Previous histologic studies indicated that subepithelial haze was
restricted to the area directly beneath the ablated area and contained
some atypical extracellular matrix (ECM) components including types
III, IV, and VII collagens; fibronectin; laminin; and tenascin, along
with proteoglycans and proliferating keratocytes.
4 5 6 7 8 The
subepithelial haze that is observed clinically in the scar region is
thought to result primarily from the nonorthogonal arrangement of
fibrillar collagen molecules (types I and III) and the presence of
nonfibrillar type IV collagen that normally are not present in high
amounts in this region of corneal stroma. In contrast, collagen in
normal clear cornea is arranged in a repeating orthogonal arrangement.
Consistent with these histologic data, a reverse
transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of rat
corneas up to 6 weeks after PRK showed upregulation of the relative
levels of mRNAs for types I, III, and V fibrillar collagens and for
type IV basement membrane collagen.
9 These data led us to
hypothesize that factors that increase corneal scarring contribute to
development of corneal subepithelial haze and regression after PRK. In
addition, the data emphasize the need to identify these factors and
develop methods to reduce their action to control corneal scarring
after PRK.
Many growth factors and cytokines have been shown to be involved in
corneal wound healing.
10 11 One growth factor in
particular, transforming growth factor (TGF)β, is a major regulator
of scar formation and is involved in fibrosis in many other
tissues.
12 For example, TGFβ directly induces
transcription of collagen genes, elastin and lysyloxidase, by
skin fibroblasts.
13 14 15 Furthermore, addition of exogenous
TGFβ increases tensile strength of incisions, and inhibition of
TGFβ with neutralizing antibodies reduces fibrosis in models of lung
fibrosis and liver cirrhosis.
16 17
The TGFβ superfamily of proteins contains many multifunctional
proteins, including TGFβs, activin-inhibin, and bone morphogenic
proteins.
18 19 In mammals, there are three isoforms of
TGFβ, designated TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβ3. The TGFβs are
homodimers of approximately 28,000 molecular weight, and they often
have similar biologic effects in vivo. The TGFβ isoforms all mediate
their effects on cells through a membrane receptor system that consists
of three distinct transmembrane proteins. Both the type I receptor
(TβRI) and the type II receptor (TβRII) are serine or threonine
kinases, and both are required for signal transduction. The type III
receptor (TβRIII) does not have kinase activity, which suggests that
it is not required for signal transduction, and its function is
unclear. Signal transduction by the TGFβ receptor system is complex
and is thought to be initiated by TGFβs binding directly to TβRII
followed by association with TβRI proteins. The trimer complex of
TGFβ, TβRI, and TβRII proteins initiates phosphorylation of
TβRI by TβRII. Phosphorylation of TβRI activates the
serine-threonine kinase active of the TβRI which in turn
phosphorylates selected members of the Smad protein
family.
20 21 The phosphorylated Smad proteins are
translocated to the nucleus and recruit other proteins into a
transcription factor complex that regulates transcription of different
genes such as collagens, fibronectin, and type 1 plasminogen activator
inhibitor.
22 23 24 25
To further investigate the involvement of the TGFβ system in corneal
scarring after excimer PRK, we developed a competition-based
quantitative RT-PCR assay that can measure the levels of low-abundance
mRNAs.
26 We used this quantitative RT-PCR technique to
measure levels of mRNAs for TGFβ2, TGFβ3, TβRII, and ECM proteins
in rat corneas at multiple time points after excimer laser PRK.
Animal procedures were performed in accordance with the ARVO
Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The
animal protocol was approved by the University of South Florida Animal
Care and Use Committee. Adult Sprague–Dawley male rats (300 g) with
normal eyes were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of
ketamine (90 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). The area around the eyes
was trimmed to remove eyelashes or whiskers in the visual field. The
eyelids and surrounding ocular areas were disinfected by scrubbing with
1% povidone-iodine solution. Anesthetized rats were placed under the
laser on a contoured vacuum pillow to prevent minor movements during
treatment. A drop of proparacaine-HCl (0.05%) was applied to the eye,
and the cornea was centered under the laser microscope. Bilateral
ablation of the corneas was performed in a 3-mm treatment zone with an
excimer laser (model 20/20B; Visx, Santa Clara, CA) using the laser in
phototherapeutic keratectomy mode and a laser fluence between 158 and
162 mJ/cm2. The corneal epithelium was ablated to
a depth of between 28 and 34 μm, followed by ablation of the stroma
to a depth of 20 μm for a total ablation depth of between 48 and 54μ
m. After laser treatment, tobramycin (0.3%) ointment was applied to
the corneal surface to prevent infection. No postoperative topical
steroid was used. Corneas were stained with fluorescein daily to
monitor corneal re-epithelialization. At 1.5, 7, 21, 42, or 91 days
after excimer laser ablation, rats were killed by peritoneal injection
of pentobarbital. Under an operating microscope, a 3-mm disposable
biopsy punch was used to excise the ablated corneal area. The corneal
buttons were snapped frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −84°C
until analyzed. Corneas from non–excimer-treated normal rats served as
control tissue.
Rat corneas were graded for the amount of corneal haze on days 1,
3, 7, 21, 42, and 91 after excimer ablation using a 0-to-4 scale
similar to that using in the U. S. Food and Drug Administration’s
clinical evaluation trial of the Visx laser: 0, clear cornea; 1, faint
haze; 2, haze present but pupil visible; 3, most of iris vessels not
visible; 4, iris and pupil completely obscured. Edema was also graded
using a 0-to-4 scale: 0, no stromal or epithelial edema; 1, slight
stromal thickness; 2, diffuse stromal edema; 3, diffuse stromal edema
with microcystic edema of the epithelium; and 4, bullous keratopathy.
The time to closure of the epithelial defect in was also assessed by
standard fluorescein staining, and corneas were graded as either healed
or not healed.
At each of the time points, four rats were killed, the eight
corneas were excised and pooled, and total RNA was prepared using
guanidine isothiocyanate and phenol-chloroform extraction (TRIzol
reagent, Gibco–Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, tissue was homogenized in 1 ml
TRIzol solution using a frosted glass-on-glass tissue grinder (Duall
20), RNA was extracted with chloroform, precipitated with
isopropanol, washed with 80% ethanol, and dissolved in RNase-free
water (0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate [DEPC]). Concentration and purity
of RNA were measured spectrophotometrically at 260 nm (GeneQuant;
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). It is important to note
that eight individual corneas from four rats were pooled for each time
point, and five separate RT reactions were performed to generate the
competition PCR curve that was used to calculate the number of mRNA
molecules for each gene (described below). The large number of
individual corneas that were pooled to create the sample for each time
point effectively converts the data into the biological average of the
tissue.
PCR amplification of cDNAs was performed in a total reaction
volume of 25 μl and contained 2.5 μl of the RT reaction product,
1.25 μl of 1 U/μl DNA polymerase (RedTaq; Sigma, St. Louis, MO),
2.5 μl of 10 × PCR buffer, 1 μl of 10 mM dNTPs, 17.25 μl of
distilled water, and 25 picomoles of 3′ primer and 5′ primer of target
gene. PCR amplification was initiated by one cycle of 94°C for 5
minutes followed by 35 sequential cycles of denaturation at 94°C for
45 seconds, annealing at 59°C for 1.5 minutes, and extension at
72°C for 2 minutes and a final extension cycle at 72°C for 10
minutes in a thermocycler (Ericomp; San Diego, CA).