We traced the propagation of HSV1 strain SC16 on serial
histologic sections after inoculation into the mucocutaneous border of
the left upper lip of mice. The use of inbred BALB/c mice, known for
their susceptibility to herpes infection, and of the highly
neurovirulent SC16 strain of HSV1
16 (10
6 PFU) allowed us to observe ocular disease in
81% of inoculated mice. Smaller inocula
(10
2–10
4 PFU) induced
lower rates of eye infection (data not shown).
In all animals with ocular disease after primary oral mucosal
infection, the ipsilateral iris was HSV1-positive from 6 DPI. At 8 and
10 DPI, the ipsilateral cornea was also infected in three of six mice.
These results show the reproducibility of HSV1 propagation from the
oral mucosa to the anterior uvea in our animal model.
We chose to inoculate small volumes of virus within the superficial
layers of the lip rather than using a scarification method to minimize
the risk of autodissemination by scratching. Although the latter could
not be excluded, because a cold sore lesion developed in all mice at 2
DPI, it could not be the origin of ocular infection, because herpes
conjunctivitis was absent, and keratitis occurred only sporadically.
The observation that the iris was always infected before the cornea
suggests that eye disease resulted from propagation of the virus within
the nervous system.
The main pathways of viral propagation are schematically
summarized in
Figure 3 . From the upper lip, the virus propagated first
to the ipsilateral SCG (2 DPI) and replicated in sympathetic neurons
innervating the lip. After replication, mature virions budding out from
these neurons infected neighboring cells by local (nonsynaptic) spread,
giving rise to multiple foci of infection at 4 DPI. At 6 DPI, the
entire SCG was infected. Neurons infected by local spread in the SCG
thus included those innervating the ipsilateral iris and ciliary body,
and most likely represented the anatomic support for propagation of the
virus to the anterior uvea. Although the propagation of HSV1 in the
nervous system is mainly subserved by transneuronal transfer between
connected neurons, HSV1 can also infect nonneuronal
cells.
19 20 Nonneuronal infection can be either
abortive
21 22 23 or productive
24 leading to the
infection of neighboring neurons.
20 This is correlated to
the neuroinvasiveness of the HSV1 strain and the susceptibility of the
animal host.
20 For example, the McIntyre-B strain does not
productively infect satellite cells within the TG of BALB/c mice,
whereas mature virions are found in these cells after infection with
the F and H129 strains.
24 The SC16 strain shows only a
restricted replication within the satellite cells of C57BL/10
mice,
25 26 whereas it can propagate by local spread to
neurons and nonneuronal cells in BALB/c mice and
rats.
19 27 Therefore, local spread of the infection within
the SCG in our model can be explained by the neuroinvasiveness of the
SC16 strain and the susceptibility of BALB/c mice, as well as the high
tropism of HSV1 for sympathetic neurons.
18
The parasympathetic relay to the iris and ciliary body (i.e., the CG),
was labeled much later than the SCG (6 DPI versus 2 DPI), which
reinforces the idea that iridociliary infection was initiated by viral
propagation through the sympathetic system. Similarly, HSV1 inoculation
into the rabbit SCG led, 3 to 4 days later, to infection of the
ipsilateral anterior uvea.
28 29
The TG and the facial nerve nucleus were the second sites of
viral replication in the nervous system (4 DPI), due to viral uptake by
sensory and motor fibers innervating the upper lip
(Fig. 3) . Viral
material was detected later in the TG than in the SCG, an observation
that could be related to the fact that strain SC16 propagates faster in
sympathetic than in some classes of sensory fibers.
18 At 4
DPI, only the maxillary part of the ganglion was labeled, but at 6 DPI
the ophthalmic part was also infected. Again, this probably reflected
local transfer of virus between the maxillary and ophthalmic fibers.
This is in agreement with tracing experiments using another herpes
virus
30 and studies on HSV1 latency after inoculation in
the lower lip.
3 The cornea became labeled 2 days after the
iris, probably as a result of viral spread through the anterior chamber
or through the sensory axons (ophthalmic fibers) rather than through
rare sympathetic endings located in the cornea.
31 32
Parasympathetic neurons in the PPG were not labeled until 6 DPI
(i.e., 4 days later than the sympathetic neurons in the SCG), even
though some parasympathetic efferents of the PPG supply the salivary
glands of the oral mucosa.
31 32 This delay makes it
unlikely that the virus traveled to the ganglion by retrograde
transport from peripheral parasympathetic nerve endings. One
possibility is that parasympathetic neurons were infected by local
transfer from sympathetic and/or trigeminal fibers traveling through
the PPG
(Fig. 3) 31 32 after replication in SCG and TG
neurons. Similarly, the parasympathetic CG neurons could be infected by
local transfer from the sympathetic fibers and/or sensory (nasociliary)
fibers that cross the ganglion. Alternatively, the virus may have
already arrived in the iris by 5 DPI (a time that was not examined) and
then propagated retrogradely to the CG.
At the time of maximal infection (6 DPI), the nucleus of the solitary
tract, area postrema and paraventricular hypothalamic nuclei were all
labeled. Such a pattern of spread is in agreement with the connections
of these structures with the sympathetic intermediolateral cell
group in the spinal cord,
33 34 35 which may have been
infected as early as 5 DPI (as suggested by heavy labeling at 6 DPI).
The infection of the locus ceruleus, suprachiasmatic nuclei, and
amygdaloid complex could be explained by their connections with the
nucleus of the solitary tract and/or the paraventricular
nucleus.
34 36 37 38 39 The labeling in deep layers of the
superior colliculus, zona incerta, and ventral posterior thalamus is in
keeping with the connections of these structures with trigeminal
nuclei.
40 41 The infection of Edinger–Westphal nuclei was
presumably retrograde from the CG
(Fig. 3) , although connections
between Edinger–Westphal and suprachiasmatic nuclei have been
suggested.
42
Altogether, these results show that HSV1 enters mostly sympathetic and
trigeminal nerve endings within the labial mucocutaneous region but
propagates most rapidly through sympathetic neurons. Propagation is due
to both transneuronal (synaptic) transmission between connected neurons
and local (per continuitatem) transfer from infected neurons to
adjacent cells.
18 19 43 The occurrence of local transfer
was highlighted by the staining of glial cells—for instance, in the
white matter near the intermediolateral cell group of the spinal
cord
(Fig. 1D) .
From 6 DPI onward, we observed a decrease in the number of
HSV1-immunolabeled cells in most infected structures, except in
sympathetic pre- and postganglionic neurons. This may be related to the
clearance of heavily infected cells by the immune system. Indeed, such
a response has been shown to occur as early as 3 DPI.
44 45 Alternatively, HSV1 become latent in sensory and autonomic neurons
connected to the eye.
3 5 6 10 46 The multiple sites of
HSV1 infection observed in our model represent potential sites of HSV1
latency, and offer an explanation for why anterior uveitis may occur
without a history of keratitis. Similarly, the staining of
paraventricular and suprachiasmatic nuclei, both connected to the
retina,
31 could explain how retinitis may occur. The role
of the suprachiasmatic nuclei in the pathogenesis of retinitis has been
suggested in other models.
42
In conclusion, the results obtained in this reproducible animal model,
which avoids infection of the eye at the time of inoculation, improve
our understanding of herpetic uveal infections. Combined with data from
previous studies, they suggest that isolated ipsilateral anterior
uveitis after intralabial viral inoculation is mediated by local virus
transfer in the SCG, from sympathetic neurons innervating the lip to
neighboring neurons innervating the anterior uvea.
The authors thank Patrice Coulon for continuous interest in
our work and Laurent Bertrand for histologic assistance.