In contrast to corneas of patients with necrotizing stromal
keratitis
17 (Fig. 2E) , murine HSK corneas are devoid of
HSV antigens.
1 2 Nonetheless, HSV-specific T cells have
been demonstrated in whole-eye cell suspensions of mice with fulminate
HSK.
3 Similarly, in 8 of the 9 HSK patients, from which
intracorneal HSV-specific T cells were recovered, the corneas were
devoid of HSV antigens. On infiltration of the cornea, these
HSV-specific T cells may have been activated by viral peptides retained
by corneal cells like Longerhans Cell (LC), or the amount of
HSV antigens in the corneas is too low to be detected by
immunohistochemistry. Alternatively, potential keratogenic
CD4
+ T cells infiltrating HSV-infected corneas
may be activated nonspecifically (e.g., by cytokine-mediated bystander
activation)
18 or activated on recognition of sequestered
corneal autoantigens unmasked or altered after HSV replication in the
cornea.
2 Recently, studies performed in the murine HSK
model have provided evidence for the latter assumption.
7 8 HSK could be induced in nude mice after adoptive transfer of HSV-1 UL6
peptide–specific CD4
+ T cells
8 cross-reacting with an unknown corneal protein.
7 We
analyzed whether this type of autoimmunity may play a role in human
HSK. In none of the TCLs generated from corneas of any of the HSK
patients studied here, reactivity to HSV-1 UL6 or a HuSoCo protein
extract could be demonstrated. Stimulation of the intracorneal TCLs
with PHA-L resulted in high proliferative responses, indicating that
this is not due to a low viability of the TCLs tested
(Table 2) . The
lack of reactivity toward HSV-1 UL6, harboring the cross-reactive
epitope, is not surprising given the constraints of major
histocompatibility complex allele-specific peptide
binding.
19 In the case of the HuSoCo protein extract, the
negative results could be due to a true lack of autoreactive T cells or
an inappropriate corneal antigen preparation used. The putative corneal
autoantigen could be located in the buffer-insoluble part of the human
cornea extract, it may be genetically polymorph or the intracorneal
autoreactive T-cell responses are mediated by
CD8
+ T cells. Given the nature of the HuCoSo
protein extract and the type of assay used (i.e., exogenous antigen
preparation in a T-cell proliferation assay), the potential role of
CD8
+ cornea autoantigen–specific T cells in HSK
could not be addressed. In the HSK mouse model, the keratogenic T-cell
clone recognized an unknown Tris–buffer soluble cornea-specific
antigen
7 and was able to induce the disease in
HSK-resistant mice, arguing against genetic polymorphism of the
autoantigen. The HuSoCo protein extract used here, obtained from 12
human cornea buttons and similarly generated as described in the murine
HSK study,
7 12 was a heterogeneous protein preparation in
which the major soluble cornea protein BCP54
12 was
predominantly present (sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis analysis; data not shown). Positive peripheral blood
T-cell responses, using similar concentrations of an equivalent HuSoCo
protein extract or purified BCP54, have been obtained in patients with
inflammatory corneal diseases.
20 21 These data suggest
that the HuSoCo protein extract used in the present study may be
considered immunogenic. Although not formally excluded, the lack of
intracorneal T-cell reactivity to HSV-1 UL6 and human corneal antigens
does not support the hypothesis that human HSK is an HSV-induced
autoimmune disease. The cloning and identification of the putative
HSK-related murine cornea autoantigen, and its human homologue will be
needed to further address the validity of the molecular mimicry
hypothesis at the single antigen level.