Because, in any species, no one has yet recorded from afferents that
can be assigned to IMCs, the nature of the signals provided by IMCs
must be entirely speculative. The major argument to classify IMCs
subjected to ultrastructural investigation, as sensory receptors was
the morphology of their nerve terminals. Thus, the particular
morphology of IMC axon terminals demands greater attention. In
cat,
14 in monkey,
15 and recently discovered
in sheep
17 IMCs, terminals frequently established close
myoneural contacts lacking a basal lamina in their synaptic cleft.
Likewise indicating the sensory nature of these terminals, attachment
plaques were demonstrated in monkey IMC.
15 In
cat
14 and sheep
17 IMCs, most terminals
established contacts exclusively with tendon fibrils, in general with
interposition of a basal lamina between axolemma and collagen.
Terminals bore mitochondria, dense cored vesicles, and clear vesicles.
Clusters of clear vesicles were often arranged close to membrane
thickenings of the axolemma, “resembling active zones in chemical
synapses.”
14 In both cat
14 and
sheep,
17 such active zones were observed only in terminals
contacting connective tissue, but never at the narrow myoneural
synaptic clefts. Sodi et al.
19 described different nerve
terminals in myotendons of human EOMs. Interestingly, these authors
reported the rare presence of terminals with typical features of motor
nerve endings.
19 In rabbit EOMs, which are richly endowed
with IMCs, axon terminals were found to form almost exclusively
myoneural synapses with typical fine structural features of motor
terminals, among them a 50-nm synaptic cleft containing a distinct
layer of basal lamina (Blumer et al., unpublished results). The present
article demonstrated that, according to the tissue component contacted,
human IMCs showed axon terminals in two fundamentally different
locations. It is evident that mammalian and human IMCs, although
exhibiting a common principle of their tissue composition, showed
considerable species variations with regard to their proportional
number of neurotendinous and myoneural terminals as well as of
ultrastructurally motor- and/or sensory-like myoneural nerve endings.