An important goal in this study was to compare our chromatic discrimination measures with important clinical parameters used to classify patients with glaucoma, such as C/D ratio and visual field perimetry measures. Our evidence of chromatic dysfunction in patients with hypertension contrasted quite strikingly with the lack of sensitivity of traditional perimetry measures such as MD.
Figure 6 shows representative graphs depicting individual raw data in
u′,
v′ space, as well as fitted ellipses taken from the three study groups. The pattern of progressive deterioration is further documented in
Figure 7 , which shows percentile distributions of ellipse length. The slight overlap between control and glaucoma groups is remarkable, with the hypertension group showing an intermediate pattern.
A significant deterioration over time of chromatic function was most prominent in patients with hypertension. The deterioration was analyzed by measuring time elapsed since diagnosis and correlating this measure with chromatic performance (length of discrimination ellipses). There was a significant correlation only in the group of patients with hypertension (r = 0.493, P = 0.0095, global r = 0.206, not significant).
Regarding the analysis of C/D ratio, this value correlated significantly with almost all our measures of chromatic performance (protan, r = 0.352; deutan r = 0.403; tritan r = 0.326; ellipse length, r = 0.400; P ≤ 0001 for all these correlation coefficients taken for the whole population of subjects). The ellipse axis ratio did not show any significant correlation with the C/D ratio, which is not surprising, given the lack of damage specificity that is evident in our data.
Regarding perimetric assessment, we found strong and significant correlations. Indeed, when psychophysical parameters were compared with parameters such as MD, strong global correlations were found (MD 30-2: protan, r = −0.278, P = 0.0009; deutan, r = −0.391 P < 0.0001; ellipse length, r = −0.440, P = 0.0015; axis ratio, ns). Not surprisingly, this correlation is mostly explained by the pattern of loss within the glaucoma group (MD 30-2: protan, r = −0.545, P = 0.0027; deutan, r = −0.631 P = 0.0003; ellipse length, r = −0.479, P = 0.0231; axis ratio, ns). No significant correlation was found with tritan axis length, suggesting that in spite of more prominent tritan loss, this measure is less correlated with field loss, once glaucoma is established.