Two cousins with congenital nystagmus, low vision, and electrophysiological evidence of a cone dysfunction differed radically with respect to color vision performance. No obvious clinical findings accounted for this discrepancy. Based on family history and data from the National Civil Register, a pedigree chart was constructed
(Fig. 1) .
Genealogical identification of the ancestors back to approximately 1800 was achieved through parish registers. Four persons (II:8, II:10, III:2, and III:4) underwent a standard ophthalmic examination, including evaluation of eye movements, visual acuity (VA), refraction, and slit lamp and fundus examinations, with fundus photography. Photopic visual field measurements were performed with a Goldmann perimeter (Haag-Streit AG, Bern, Switzerland) with objects I/4e and IV/4e.
Color vision was evaluated with the following tests: Ishihara 38 plates 1986 edition, Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 (F-M D-15) standard and desaturated, Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test (F-M 100), Lanthony’s tritan album (LTA), American Optical Hand-Hardy-Rittler (AOHRR), Berson’s blue cone monocromacy test,
11 and Nagel’s anomaloscope (Schmidt-Haensch, Berlin, Germany). The test battery also included a standardized color sheet (DS735) with 17 colors presented as separate circular plates 25 mm in diameter.
Dark adaptation was measured with a Goldmann-Weekers instrument (Haag-Streit AG) according to the instruction manual for the integral examination of the whole retina. Normal values for comparison were obtained in 25 healthy individuals.
Full-field ERG recordings according to the standard protocol of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) were made from one eye only.
12 The pupils were dilated with cyclopentolate 1% followed by dark adaptation for 30 minutes. The recordings were performed with a Burian-Allen monopolar electrode in topical anesthesia with oxybuprocaine 1%. A reference silver ear-clip electrode was placed on the opposite earlobe and a ground electroencephalogram (EEG) silver cup electrode on the forehead.
Stimulations were produced with a xenon flash tube with adjustable intensity (0.16–2.2 J/flash) mounted in a Ganzfeld globe (Nicolet Biomedical Instruments, Madison, WI). The white background luminosity inside the sphere was adjusted to 17-cd/m2 photopic measurements. A yellow background was obtained by inserting a glass filter (model OG 530; Schott; Mainz, Germany) in front of the illuminating bulb and adjusting the illumination lamp’s intensity to 100 cd/m2. The flash intensity was 0.5 U, equivalent to 12 cd-s/m2 at the surface of the bowl. Attenuation of the flash intensity was obtained by inserting neutral-density filters in front of the flash bulb. The duration of the flash was 20 to 30 μs. Amplification, filtering, and averaging of the recordings were accomplished with a workstation (Viking IV; Nicolet Biomedical Instruments). Band-pass filters were 0.2 to 1000 Hz, except for the recording of oscillatory potentials (OPs; band-pass 100–1000 Hz) and blue cone recordings (band-pass 5–1000 Hz). A unit log improvement in signal-to-noise ratio was obtained with a digital IIR high-Q band-pass filter with second-order slopes (center frequency 30.0 Hz; bandwidth 1.0 Hz). Multifocal ERG (mf)ERG was recorded with a visual evoked potential imaging system (VERIS ver. 4.1; EDI, San Mateo, CA). The examination was performed in tandem with the ERG recordings, using the same electrode. Stimulation was performed with 103 hexagons with full contrast and scaled with eccentricity, by using a camera attachment allowing for visual control of the fixation. The overall stimulation pattern subtended a visual angle of 20° to 30° on either side of fixation. Data processing was accomplished with the standard clinic software program. The study adhered to the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and written informed consent was obtained from all examined family members.
Blood samples were taken from the proband (III:4), the affected cousin (III:2), his healthy brother and sister, and both parents of the two patients
(Fig. 1) .