Abstract
purpose. Because the expression of classic and nonclassic HLA antigens is crucial for the recognition and elimination of tumor cells by cytotoxic T and/or NK cells, we analyzed the HLA-A, -B, -C, and -G expression in uveal melanoma specimens from 18 patients.
methods. Tumor specimens and EDTA plasma samples from 18 patients treated by primary enucleation or tumor resection for primary uveal melanoma in the University Eye Clinic, Essen, Germany, were collected immediate after surgery. After solubilization of tumor tissue and specific immunoprecipitation of classic HLA-A, -B, and -C and nonclassic HLA-G antigens the tumor samples were analyzed by one-dimensional isoelectric focusing (1D-IEF) and Western blot analysis. In parallel, patients were typed for HLA-A, -B, and -C class I antigens by PCR with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). In addition, HLA-A2 and -G expression was investigated by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded tumor sections from these patients.
results. In 9 (50%) of 18 specimens, a full HLA-A and -B antigen expression pattern was detected by 1D-IEF. In six (33.3%) tumor specimens, an HLA class I allotype was missing (HLA-A2, -A28, -A29, -B18, -B35, and -B55), in two cases a haplotypic loss (HLA-A2, -B44 and HLA-A2, -B13) and in another case an allotype-specific loss combined with a haplotypic loss (HLA-A26, -A32, -B41) were observed. HLA-C and -G antigens were not detectable in any of the tumor samples by biochemical methods used.
conclusions. A considerable portion of the uveal melanomas tested showed a loss of classic HLA class I antigens, which may enable them to escape from the immunosurveillance of cytotoxic T cells. HLA-C and -G antigens were not found in uveal melanoma tissue implying a susceptibility for NK lysis.
Therapy of uveal melanoma within the eye is successful in most patients. However, in 30% to 50% of the patients, metastasis occurs, and the outcome is fatal in less than 1 year after manifestation of dissemination of the tumor, most commonly in the liver.
1 2 To improve the survival rate of patients with uveal melanoma, an adjuvant therapy is needed.
Immunotherapy is a promising approach, because it is based on the “natural” way to detect and destroy disseminated tumor cells by the host immune system. Cytotoxic lymphocytes, which include CD4
+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), CD8
+ CTLs, natural killer (NK) cells, and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells, can kill tumor cells by using one of the following two pathways: secretion of cytotoxic cytokines or calcium-dependent or calcium-independent contact-dependent cytotoxicity.
3 During the past two decades, numerous trials of immunotherapy have been conducted in patients with malignancies. Both promising and disappointing results have been reported. However, in most tumors, mechanisms develop that enable them to escape host immune surveillance, which results in primary failure of immunotherapy or even secondary failure after an initially successful response. Many pathways of immune escape are known, including signaling defects in T cells, contact-induced anergy of T cells, and downregulation of HLA expression in tumor tissue.
4
The latter is probably the best-established pathway of tumor escape, as shown in many different types of malignancy.
5 6 Especially in uveal melanoma there is evidence that the downregulation of HLA-A and -B antigens correlates with a favorable patient outcome,
7 8 which is completely different from the situation known to exist with other tumors. These data suggest a protective role of NK cells in the development of metastasis.
7 8 A recent study demonstrated further that uveal melanomas do not express the HLA-G antigen, which is a nonclassic HLA class I molecule known to inhibit NK cell–mediated cytotoxicity.
9 Although the body of evidence is increasing that influencing the NK cell pathway of cytotoxicity would be the most promising immunotherapy in patients with uveal melanoma, no established approach to perform this in a clinical trial exists. Therefore, immunotherapy based on HLA class I restricted CTLs remains an alternative when planning an adjuvant therapy in these patients.
Crucial for an immune-response–based immunotherapy (e.g., vaccine) is the expression pattern of HLA-class I molecules in the tumor tissue. For example, most of the vaccines used are HLA-A2 restricted. For this reason, it is very important to know the HLA-A2 expression pattern in the targeted tumor. Very little is known about the allotypic HLA expression in uveal melanomas. Some information was obtained by two previous immunohistochemical studies in tumor specimens and cell lines, using a small panel of antibodies (specific for A-locus A2, A3; B-locus Bw4, Bw6).
10 11 Recently another study of cell lines from uveal melanomas in which a broader panel of antibodies and flow cytometry were used demonstrated a high frequency of allotype-specific downregulation of HLA class I molecules.
12
In the present study we screened 18 primary uveal melanomas for the expression of HLA-A, -B, -C, and -G antigens using another approach, one-dimensional isoelectric focusing (1D-IEF) and SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot analysis allowing an allotypic expression analysis.
After mechanical homogenization of frozen tissue specimens (approximately 100 mg) membrane-anchored antigens were solubilized in 1 mL lysis buffer (1% TX114, 50 mM Tris, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [pH 7.5]) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cell fragments and DNA were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000g at 4°C, and the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube. The supernatant containing solubilized antigens was incubated for 5 minutes at 37°C, followed by centrifugation at 300g for 10 minutes. The upper aqueous phase was discarded and the detergent phase, enriched with cell-surface–anchored molecules, was filled up to 1 mL with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2). The protein concentration of each tissue lysate was determined with the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (BCA; Pierce, Rockford, IL). All tissue lysates were diluted with PBS to a fixed protein concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. The reference cell lines M1 and M2 were treated as the tissue specimens.
To precipitate solubilized HLA class I molecules, 1 mL of detergent lysate was incubated with 100 μL of immunomagnetic beads (Dynabeads TM M280; Dynal, Hamburg, Germany) precoated with mAb W6/32 (5 μg/mL), mAb BFL1.1 (10 μg/mL), or mAb MEM/G9 (10 μg/mL) overnight at 4°C under rotation. For 1D-IEF analysis the beads were treated with 0.2 U neuraminidase type VIII (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Deisenhofen, Germany) in 50 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.5) and 1 mM CaCl2 for 5 hour at 37°C. Then 50 μL of 1D-IEF sample buffer (9.5 M urea, 2% Ampholyte [Pharmacia Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden; pH 3.5–10], 2% Triton X-100) was added. For SDS-PAGE analysis the beads were incubated for 5 minutes at 95°C with 1% SDS and 150 mM β-mercaptoethanol.
1D-IEF, SDS-PAGE, and Western blot analysis were performed as described previously.
15 16 Bound HLA-A, -B, and -G antigens were detected by either an overnight incubation with antiserum RaHC or RaHLA-C diluted to 1:10.000 in PBS-Tween (0.05%) and with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG diluted 1:1000 in PBS-Tween (0.05%) for 1 hour. Bound antibodies were visualized by nitroblue tetrazolium (0.1 mg/mL), 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (0.05 mg/mL), and MgCl
2 (1 mM) in Tris-HCl (0.1 M, pH 9.6).