There is a growing body of evidence supporting the role of the splicing machinery as a potentially potent modifier of the phenotypic outcome of a genotype.
54 55 Accurate splicing is paramount to eukaryotic cell function but exon–intron boundaries are defined by weakly conserved intronic
cis-elements (the 5′ or donor splice site, the 3′ or acceptor splice site, and the branch site), and require additional elements, termed ESEs and exonic splicing silencers (ESSs), to define the exon.
56 57 58 Splicing disruptions can play a modifier role that influences phenotypic variability, such as tissue–organ specificity, disease severity, and age of onset.
59 The extent of splicing as a significant disease-causing mechanism is underestimated,
54 58 60 as it is thought that at least 15% of disease-causing point mutations (missense/nonsense) can cause RNA splicing defects.
58 61 Traditionally, translationally silent or synonymous changes were considered as coding single-nucleotide polymorphisms (cSNPs), with little if any functional significance. However, these silent changes have the potential to alter the efficiency and specificity of alternative splicing and so contribute to phenotypic variability.
58 We have evaluated the pathogenicity of synonymous sequence variations such as L41L, because this was seen in two patients with glaucoma but was absent from control individuals (0/165). When combining these data with results of Sarfarazi et al., in which L41L was detected in 4 of 523 patients with POAG/NTG but was not seen in 108 additional control individuals (Sarfarazi M, personal communication, May 2003), L41L was detected in 6 of 678 patients with glaucoma (0.9% of POAG/JOAG) and was absent from control subjects (0/273). The G nucleotide involved is highly conserved among the human, macaque, rat, mouse, and bovine sequences (data not shown). Using several experimental approaches, we were unable to detect aberrant or skipped transcript arising from the c.433G→A (L41L) change. Mutant, alternatively spliced transcripts can be rare, as ESS and ESE disruptions are not an all-or-nothing disease mechanism. The degree of exon skipping and relative levels of mutant determine disease severity, but may also be tissue specific.
54 This situation has recently been reported, for the ryanodine receptor (
RYR1) gene,
62 in which the mutant aberrantly spliced transcript shows a tissue-specific expression and is only detected in skeletal muscle resulting in a congenital myopathy.
63 Ocular tissue from our patients was not available to test for tissue-specific defects in
OPTN expression in affected individuals harboring
OPTN sequence variations. However, preliminary work assessing the differential expression of OPTN using fetal brain cDNA, trabecular meshwork, nonpigmented ciliary epithelium, and leukocyte cDNA showed a difference in the expressed isoforms. Differences in the relative levels and activities of splicing factors (SR proteins and hnRNPs) may regulate tissue-specific differences in splicing patterns and alter phenotypic severity.
54 63 64 65 66