May 2005
Volume 46, Issue 5
Free
Erratum  |   May 2005
Erratum
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2005, Vol.46, 1556. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      User Alerts
      You are adding an alert for:
      Erratum
      You will receive an email whenever this article is corrected, updated, or cited in the literature. You can manage this and all other alerts in My Account
      The alert will be sent to:
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation
      Citation

      Erratum. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(5):1556.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
    • Get Permissions
  • Supplements
Erratum in: “The Inhibitory Interaction between Human Corneal and Conjunctival Sensory Channels” by Feng and Simpson (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1251–1255). 
In the published Figure 1 , the lower right-hand labels were switched. The correct figureand labels are shown below. 
Figure 1.
Corneal and conjunctival mechanical transducer functions. The conjunctival scaling curves are lower than the corneal one. The paired conjunctival curve is even lower than the unpaired one. The separation of the two conjunctival curves is more apparent at high than at low stimulus intensity.
View OriginalDownload Slide
 
Corneal and conjunctival mechanical transducer functions. The conjunctival scaling curves are lower than the corneal one. The paired conjunctival curve is even lower than the unpaired one. The separation of the two conjunctival curves is more apparent at high than at low stimulus intensity.
Figure 1.
 
Corneal and conjunctival mechanical transducer functions. The conjunctival scaling curves are lower than the corneal one. The paired conjunctival curve is even lower than the unpaired one. The separation of the two conjunctival curves is more apparent at high than at low stimulus intensity.
Corneal and conjunctival mechanical transducer functions. The conjunctival scaling curves are lower than the corneal one. The paired conjunctival curve is even lower than the unpaired one. The separation of the two conjunctival curves is more apparent at high than at low stimulus intensity.
View OriginalDownload Slide
Figure 1.
Corneal and conjunctival mechanical transducer functions. The conjunctival scaling curves are lower than the corneal one. The paired conjunctival curve is even lower than the unpaired one. The separation of the two conjunctival curves is more apparent at high than at low stimulus intensity.
View OriginalDownload Slide
 
Corneal and conjunctival mechanical transducer functions. The conjunctival scaling curves are lower than the corneal one. The paired conjunctival curve is even lower than the unpaired one. The separation of the two conjunctival curves is more apparent at high than at low stimulus intensity.
Figure 1.
 
Corneal and conjunctival mechanical transducer functions. The conjunctival scaling curves are lower than the corneal one. The paired conjunctival curve is even lower than the unpaired one. The separation of the two conjunctival curves is more apparent at high than at low stimulus intensity.
Corneal and conjunctival mechanical transducer functions. The conjunctival scaling curves are lower than the corneal one. The paired conjunctival curve is even lower than the unpaired one. The separation of the two conjunctival curves is more apparent at high than at low stimulus intensity.
View OriginalDownload Slide
Copyright 2005 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.Accept