Another intriguing similarity between EP
2 agonists and FP agonists is their potential to stimulate the endogenous formation of prostanoids in the anterior segment. FP agonists have been shown to stimulate endogenous formation of PGE
2 in ocular tissues,
25 26 cultured melanocytes,
27 and nonpigmented ciliary epithelial (NPE) cells.
28 29 In NPE cells, the formation of PGE
2 is also stimulated by the EP
2 agonist butaprost.
29 The increased PGE
2 formation appears to be caused by an upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2),
27 28 29 which is accompanied by phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) p38 and p42/44,
28 29 indicating a common signaling pathway for FP and EP
2 agonists. Furthermore, both latanoprost and PGE
2 upregulated the expression of MMP-1 in NPE cells, with PGE
2 being effective already at nanomolar concentrations.
28 These findings prompted the authors to suggest that latanoprost, via Ca
2+, PKC and MAPKs, upregulate the expression of COX-2 and hence the formation of PGE
2, which subsequently increases the MMP-1 expression. MMP-1 could then be released from the nonpigmented ciliary epithelium, transported by the aqueous humor to the ciliary muscle and trabecular meshwork, to induce tissue remodeling and facilitation of outflow.
28 However, PGE
2 is not the only prostaglandin released by FP receptor stimulation
25 and COX-2 is also responsible for the formation of prostaglandin glycerol esters and ethanolamides (prostamides) from the endocannabinoids 2-arachidonylglycerol and anandamide, respectively.
30 31 Thus, several prostanoids with potential effects on uveoscleral outflow could be formed endogenously after exogenous application of prostanoid analogues. Furthermore, prostamides, and possibly prostaglandin glycerol esters, may have been misidentified as prostaglandins; commercially available antibodies directed against PGE
2 and PGF
2α cross-reacted with PGE
2 ethanolamide and PGF
2α ethanolamide, respectively.
32