One hundred fifteen myopic eyes of 115 subjects were analyzed. The mean age, axial length, and spherical equivalent were 35.9 ± 9.6 years (range, 22–60), 26.08 ± 1.33 mm (range, 22.73–28.79), and −7.31 ± 3.04 D (range, −0.75 to −13.88), respectively. Significant correlation was found between the axial length and the spherical equivalent (
r = −0.778,
P < 0.001).
Table 1presents the characteristics of the high myopia (spherical equivalent < −6.0 D,
n = 75) and low-to-moderate myopia (spherical equivalent between −6.0 D and −0.5 D,
n = 40) groups. No significant age difference was found between the groups, and age did not correlate significantly with axial length (
P = 0.195), spherical equivalent (
P = 0.410), visual field mean deviation (MD;
P = 0.683)/pattern standard deviation (
P = 0.116), or the average RNFL thickness (
P = 0.681). The visual field MD of the high myopia group was −1.08 ± 1.08 dB, which was worse than that of the low-to-moderate myopia group (−0.61 ± 1.04 dB,
P = 0.026). The visual field MD correlated significantly with average RNFL thickness (
r = 0.242,
n = 115,
P = 0.009). The average RNFL thickness in highly myopic eyes was 100.69 ± 10.36 μm, which was significantly thinner than that in low-to-moderately myopic eyes (107.49 ± 12.74 μm;
P = 0.003). Analyses at individual clock hours showed that the high myopia group had significantly lower RNFL measurements at 12, 1, and 7 o’clock than did the low-to-moderate myopia group (
P < 0.05; right eye orientation;
Table 2 ) and the respective RNFL profiles are plotted in
Figure 1 . A double-hump pattern, with peaks over the superotemporal (11 o’clock) and inferotemporal (7 o’clock) sectors and troughs over the nasal (3 o’clock) and temporal (9 o’clock) sectors, was observed in both groups. The average RNFL thickness decreased with the axial length/negative spherical equivalent, with coefficients of correlation of −0.314 (
P = 0.001) and 0.291 (
P = 0.002), respectively
(Fig. 2) . Significant correlations between RNFL thickness and axial length/spherical equivalent were found in each clock hour except in the temporal sector (8–11 o’clock;
Table 3 ). A subgroup analysis including only young subjects with age ranging from 25 to 29 (
n = 36) was also performed. (This age range was selected because it constituted the highest proportion of subjects: 36/115, or 31.3%, in the study group.) A similar correlation profile was evident with
r = −0.569 (
P < 0.001) and 0.542 (
P = 0.001) for the association between average RNFL thickness and axial length and spherical equivalent, respectively
(Table 4) .