Abstract
purpose. Thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) expression is upregulated in the orbits of patients with Graves ophthalmopathy (GO), most of whom have TSHR-stimulating antibodies. The authors investigated the biological effects of TSHR activation in vitro in adipose tissue, the site of orbital TSHR expression.
methods. Activating mutant TSHR (TSHR*) or wild-type (WT) was introduced into human orbital preadipocytes using retroviral vectors. Their proliferation (Coulter counting), basal cAMP accumulation (radioimmunoassay), and spontaneous and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ)-induced adipogenesis (quantitative oil red O staining) were assessed and compared with those of nonmodified cells. QRT-PCR was used to measure transcripts of CCAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP)β, PPARγ, and lipoprotein lipase (LPL; early, intermediate, and late markers of adipogenesis) and for uncoupling protein (UCP)-1 (brown adipose tissue [BAT]).
results. Expression of TSHR* significantly inhibited the proliferation of preadipocytes and produced an increase in unstimulated cAMP of 200% to 600%. Basal lipid levels were significantly increased in TSHR* (127%–275%) compared with nonmodified (100%) or WT-expressing (104%–187%) cells. This was accompanied by 2- to 10-fold increases in early-intermediate markers and UCP-1 transcripts (2- to 8-fold); LPL was at the limit of detection. In nonmodified cells, adipogenesis produced significant increases in transcripts of all markers, including LPL (approximately 30-fold). This was not the case in TSHR*-expressing cells, which also displayed 67% to 84% reductions in lipid levels.
conclusions. TSHR activation stimulates early differentiation (favoring BAT formation?) but renders preadipocytes refractory to PPARγ-induced adipogenesis. In neither case did lipid-containing vacuoles accumulate, suggesting that terminal stages of differentiation were inhibited.
Graves disease (GD) is caused by thyrotropin (TSH) receptor (TSHR)– stimulating antibodies (TSABs) that mimic the action of TSH and produce hyperthyroidism.
1 A proportion of GD patients have ophthalmopathy (GO), in which expansion of the orbital contents by adipogenesis, overproduction of extracellular matrix, and edema lead to proptosis.
2 The target autoantigen of GD, the TSHR, is expressed in the orbits of GO patients.
3 4 Specifically, it is upregulated during adipogenesis.
5 6 Recent improvements in patient management, especially in avoiding elevated TSH levels, have decreased the incidence of GO.
7 Furthermore, a positive correlation has been reported between TSAB titer and GO activity,
8 as assessed using a clinical activity score (CAS). These facts suggest that TSHR activation (TSHR*), either by excess hormones or TSABs, contribute to the disease process.
The receptor can also be activated by gain-of-function mutations, with somatic changes responsible for toxic adenoma and germline mutations causing familial hyperthyroidism.
1 Of interest, two newborns harboring different activating germline TSHR mutations, L629F and M453T, displayed proptosis.
9 10 We have exploited this activation mechanism to establish an in vitro model to investigate the resultant biological effects, beginning with adipose tissue, the site of TSHR expression in the orbit.
Various cell populations (in 12-well plates) were examined in complete and differentiation medium. Microscopic examination provided a means of determining whether morphologic changes, e.g., rounding up of cells or acquisition of lipid-filled droplets, had occurred. In addition, the cells were subjected to oil red O staining, followed by extraction of the absorbed dye with 100% isopropanol and measurement of the OD490. Coulter counting of adjacent wells provided an accurate cell number for standardization of OD values.
Results obtained with oil red O staining of the mutant-expressing preadipocytes were paradoxical. Microscopic examination revealed no positive vacuoles in complete medium and reduced or no vacuoles in differentiation medium, yet the basal lipid content of the cells was higher but failed to increase in response to a PPARγ agonist. To investigate further, the transcript copy number of genes whose expression is upregulated during adipogenesis was calculated.
In nonmodified preadipocytes, PPARγ-induced adipogenesis (visible oil red O–positive lipid droplets) was accompanied by an increase in all the markers of differentiation tested compared with the equivalent transcript copy number obtained in these cells in complete medium.
In the TSHR*-expressing cells, no PPARγ-induced adipogenesis was apparent, and the transcript copy number of the differentiation markers was not increased. In fact, in some instances it was reduced compared with the same cells in complete medium.
When comparing the nonmodified cells and the TSHR*-expressing cells, all in complete medium, transcript copy numbers for markers of early to intermediate differentiation and brown adipose tissue formation, but not those for the terminal stages of adipogenesis, were upregulated, as summarized in
Table 2 . A representative example of the individual Ct values obtained is shown in
Table 3 .
Orbital fat is a scarce commodity, compounded by the loss of phenotype of preadipocytes that have undergone several passages. We modified explant cultures, transferred the adipose tissue fragments to new dishes for reattachment, and thus were able to harvest first-passage preadipocytes for several months.
A heterogeneous population of cells migrates from the explants, including fibroblast-like preadipocytes and cells at various stages of fat maturation. Cells containing lipid vacuoles could be fibroblast-like preadipocytes undergoing adipogenesis or cells at various stages of fat maturation in the process of de-differentiating. Gesta et al.
14 have indicated that de-differentiation occurs within the first 48 hours of culture. We observed cells close to the explants with lipid-filled droplets that persisted for several months. Only detachment or removal of the explant reduced the lipid droplets, indicating the production of pro-adipogenic signals, both soluble and through cell–cell contact, by mature fat.
Our subsequent experiments indicated that TSHR activation stimulates the early stages of adipogenesis but inhibits the terminal stages of differentiation. The absence of lipid-filled droplets, combined with increased cellular lipid content, suggests that lipolysis is upregulated or that the cytoskeletal changes necessary for droplet formation have been inhibited. The fact that lipoprotein lipase transcripts remain at the limit of detection in cells expressing TSHR* favors the latter mechanism. The results agree with earlier reports of cAMP elevation rapidly reducing a suppressor of adipogenesis, Wnt,
15 thereby promoting differentiation. In contrast, prolonged elevation of cAMP by pharmacologic agents reduced the accumulation of lipids by decreasing key lipogenic enzymes rather than increasing lipolysis.
16
TSHR activation also seems to favor the development of brown adipose tissue. Although elevated UCP-1 transcripts are a feature of human preadipocytes exposed to PPARγ agonists,
17 we observed an increase in UCP-1 copies in the TSHR*-expressing cells, even in complete medium (basal conditions). It is possible that this feature may be restricted to orbital preadipocytes, a depot having many similarities with brown adipose tissue such as selective expansion (along with intrascapular fat) in mice overexpressing adiponectin.
18
We opted to use gain-of-function mutants of the TSHR as an activation mechanism rather than adding the pathologic ligands TSAB. At the time this study began, only patient sera containing heterogeneous mixes of TSAB were available because monoclonal TSABs have only recently been developed.
19 20 21 22 Furthermore, our previous experiences demonstrated that the vectors transduced a physiological level of TSHR expression because we were unable to distinguish endogenous rat TSHR from transduced human TSHR using flow cytometry in a rat thyroid cell line.
12 The model also has the advantage of generating free α and β/γ subunits of the G protein, unlike an earlier study
23 in which constitutively active Gsα mutants were expressed in the murine 3T3L1 cell line There was no effect on proliferation; basal cAMP or rates of adipogenesis compared with nonmodified cells were not examined.
Recent studies have reported that the activation of CREB (by phosphorylation) is necessary and sufficient to induce adipogenesis in the 3T3L1 preadipocyte cell line.
24 CREB can be activated by the cAMP/PKA route, though there are other activation mechanisms. In the FRTL5 thyroid cell line, we observed increased phosphorylated CREB (p-CREB) in cells expressing TSHR* compared with the WT or nonmodified cells.
25 Thus, we expected that the human preadipocytes expressing the same gain-of-function mutant TSHR would also have increased p-CREB and should thus have exhibited spontaneous adipogenesis. However preliminary experiments indicate that this is not the case, with threefold to fourfold higher levels of pCREB present in WT compared with activating mutant TSHR-expressing cells. This is in agreement with the work of Brunetti et al.,
26 who demonstrated increased adenylate cyclase but reduced pCREB in toxic adenoma (somatic TSHR*) compared with adjacent healthy thyroid tissue. We assume that the discrepancy between cAMP and pCREB is the consequence of upregulation of counterregulatory mechanisms—e.g., the inducible cAMP early repressor
27 —induced by the higher levels of cAMP present in the L629F- and M453T-transduced preadipocytes. The difference illustrates that though they provide useful in vitro models, rodent preadipocyte cell lines do not replicate all aspects of human adipogenesis.
Although we have investigated primary preadipocytes, our model does not faithfully reproduce TSHR expression during adipogenesis. Haraguchi et al.
28 demonstrated that the receptor is upregulated and reaches a maximum at around day 9 of an adipogenesis protocol, including insulin, dexamethasone, and a phosphodiesterase inhibitor. Transcript levels then declined. Our vectors are driven by a viral promoter so that receptor expression is permanently “ON. ” We are generating inducible retroviral vectors and siRNA to permit the modulation of activating TSHR expression and to mimic more closely that occurring during adipogenesis.
Apart from this shortcoming, our model has addressed how TSHR activation might affect just one of the mechanisms operating to increase the orbital volume in GO. We are aware that not all GO patients have circulating TSABs and that other processes may be in operation. Furthermore, the TSHR is expressed on only a small proportion of orbital fibroblasts.
Increased cAMP in preadipocytes has been associated with the production of an adipogenic factor, a putative endogenous PPARγ agonist.
29 If this were the case, TSHR activation could have an indirect effect on adipogenesis by elaborating an adipogenic factor having paracrine effects. Experiments are under way using conditioned media from our transduced cells to investigate their proadipogenic activity on primary preadipocytes from various fat depots, including the orbit.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that TSHR activation stimulates early differentiation and may favor the formation of brown adipose tissue. In contrast, TSHR activation renders preadipocytes refractory to PPARγ-induced adipogenesis. In neither case do lipid-containing vacuoles accumulate, suggesting that terminal stages of differentiation have been inhibited.
These authors contributed equally to the work presented here and should therefore be regarded as equivalent authors.
Present affiliation: Medizinische Klinik III, Universitaet Leipzig, Germany.
Supported by grants from The Wellcome Trust and the Wales Office for Research and Development.
Submitted for publication June 2, 2006; revised July 26 and August 21, 2006; accepted October 10, 2006.
Disclosure:
L. Zhang, None;
G. Baker, None;
D. Janus, None;
C.A. Paddon, None;
D. Fuhrer, None;
M. Ludgate, None
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked “
advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Marian Ludgate, Centre for Endocrine and Diabetes Sciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Main Building, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK;
[email protected].
Table 1. Forward and Reverse Primer Sequences, Exon Locations, and Amplicon Sizes for Genes Analyzed by QRT-PCR
Table 1. Forward and Reverse Primer Sequences, Exon Locations, and Amplicon Sizes for Genes Analyzed by QRT-PCR
Gene | bp | Forward | | Reverse | |
| | Primer | Exon | Primer | Exon |
C/EBPβ | 304 | AACTTTGGCACTGGGG | 1 | GGCCCGGCTGACAGTT | 1 |
PPARγ | 390 | CAGTGGGGATGTCTCATA | 3 | CTTTTGGCATACTCTGTGAT | 5 |
LPL | 275 | GAGATTTCTCTGTATGGACC | 7 | CTGCAAATGAGACACTTTCTC | 9 |
UCP-1 | 540 | CGGATGAAACTCTACAGCGG | 2 | CACTTTTGTACTGTCCTGGTGG | 5 |
APRT | 247 | GCTGCGTGCTCATCCGAAAG | 3 | CTTTAAGCGAGGTCAGCTGC | 5 |
| Fold Change in TCN PPARγ vs. Basal Medium | | Fold Change TCN Basal TSHR* vs. Nonmodified |
| Nonmodified Cells | TSHR* Expressing | |
C/EBPβ | 1.5–5 × increase | 2–3 × reduction | 2–10 × increase |
PPARγ | 7–20 × increase | 0–4 × increase | 2–4 × increase |
LPL | 20–30 × increase | Limit of detection | Limit of detection |
UCP-1 | 10–150 × increase | 0–7 × increase | 2–8 × increase |
Table 3. Crossing Threshold Values Obtained in Preadipocytes from a Donor Free of GO and Maintained in Complete Medium or in Differentiation Medium
Table 3. Crossing Threshold Values Obtained in Preadipocytes from a Donor Free of GO and Maintained in Complete Medium or in Differentiation Medium
Ct | Complete Medium | | PPARγ-Induced Adipogenesis | |
| APRT | PPARγ | APRT | PPARγ |
Non-Go | 26.5 ± 0.2 | 30.3 ± 0.6 | 25 ± 0.3 | 25.2 ± 0.5 |
WT | 26 ± 0.1 | 29 ± 0.2 | 26.6 ± 0.7 | 29.1 ± 0.8 |
L629F | 25.4 ± 0.3 | 27 ± 0.6 | 24.3 ± 0.4 | 26 ± 0.4 |
M453T | 26 ± 0.5 | 28 ± 0.5 | 25 ± 0.2 | 26 ± 0.6 |
The authors thank Carol Lane for providing orbital samples and Maurice Scanlon for his continued support. The authors also thank the Wellcome Trust and the Wales Office of Research and Development for providing the funding.
PaschkeR, LudgateM. The thyrotropin receptor in thyroid disease. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1675–1681.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]LudgateM, BakerG. Unlocking the immunological mechanisms of orbital inflammation in thyroid eye disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002;127:193–198.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]FelicielloA, PorcelliniA, CiulloL, BonavolontaG, AvvedimentoE, FenziG. Expression of thyrotropin receptor mRNA in healthy and Graves’ disease retro-orbital tissue. Lancet. 1993;342:337–338.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]CrispM, LaneC, HalliwellM, Wynford-ThomasD, LudgateM. Thyrotropin receptor transcripts in human adipose tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:2003–2005.
[PubMed]StarkeyKJ, JanezicA, JonesG, JordanN, BakerG, LudgateM. Adipose thyrotropin receptor expression is elevated in Graves’ and thyroid eye diseases ex vivo and indicates adipogenesis in progress in vivo. J Mol Endocrinol. 2003;30:369–380.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]ValyaseviRW, EricksonDZ, HarteneckDA, et al. Differentiation of human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts induces expression of functional thyrotropin receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:2557–2562.
[PubMed]KungAW, YauCC, ChengA. The incidence of ophthalmopathy after radioiodine treatment for Graves’ disease: prognostic factors and the role of methimazole. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79:542–546.
[PubMed]KhooDH, HoSC, SeahLL, et al. The combination of absent thyroid peroxidase antibodies and high thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin levels in Graves’ disease identifies a group at markedly increased risk of ophthalmopathy. Thyroid. 1999;9:1175–1180.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]De RouxN, PolakM, CouetJ, et al. A neomutation of the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor in a severe neonatal hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:2023–2026.
[PubMed]FuhrerD, WonerowP, WillgerodtW, ScherbaumW, PaschkeR. Identification of a new TSH receptor germline mutation (Leu629Phe) in a family with neonatal onset of autosomal dominant nonautoimmune hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:4234–4238.
[PubMed]StarkeyK, HeufelderA, BakerG, et al. PPARγ in thyroid eye disease: contra-indication for thiazolidenedione use?. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:55–59.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]FuhrerD, LewisMD, AlkhafajiF, et al. Biological activity of activating TSHR mutants depends on the cellular context. Endocrinology. 2003;144:4018–4030.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]CrispMS, StarkeyKJ, LaneC, HamJ, LudgateM. Adipogenesis in thyroid eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3249–3255.
[PubMed]GestaS, LolmedeK, DaviaudD, et al. Culture of human adipose tissue explants lead to profound alteration of adipocyte gene expression. Horm Metab Res. 2003;35:158–163.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]BennettCN, RossSE, LongoKA, et al. Regulation of Wnt signaling during adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:30998–31004.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]SpiegelmanB, GreenH. Cyclic AMP-mediated control of lipogenic enzyme synthesis during adipose differentiation of 3T3 cells. Cell. 1981;24:503–510.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]DigbyJE, MontagueCT, SewterCP, et al. Thiazolidinedione exposure increases the expression of uncoupling protein 1 in cultured human preadipocytes. Diabetes. 1998;47:138–141.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]CombsTP, PajvaniUB, BergAH, et al. A transgenic mouse with a deletion in the collagenous domain of adiponectin displays elevated circulating adiponectin and improved insulin sensitivity. Endocrinology. 2004;145:367–383.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]AndoT, LatifR, PritskerA, MoranT, NagayamaY, DaviesTF. A monoclonal thyroid stimulating antibody. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:1167–1174.
CostagliolaS, FrannsenJDF, BonomiM, et al. Generation of a mouse monoclonal TSH-receptor antibody with stimulating activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;299:891–896.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]SandersJ, JeffreysJ, DepraetereH, et al. Thyroid-stimulating monoclonal antibodies. Thyroid. 2002;12:1043–1050.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]SandersJ, EvansM, PremawardhanaLDKE, et al. Human monoclonal thyroid stimulating antibody. Lancet. 2003;362:126–128.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]GordeladzeJO, HovikKE, MerendinoJJ, HermouetS, GutkindS, AcciliD. Effect of activating and inactivating mutations of Gs and Gi2 alpha protein subunits on growth and differentiation of 3T3L1 preadipocytes. J Cell Biochem. 1997;64:242–257.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]ReuschJEB, ColtonLA, KlemmDJ. CREB activation induces adipogenesis in 3T3–L1 cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:1008–1020.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Al-KhafajiF, WiltshireM, FuhrerD, et al. Biological activity of activating TSHR mutants: modulation by iodide. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005;34:209–220.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]BrunettiA, ChiefariE, FilettiS, RussoD. The 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein (CREB) is functionally reduced in human toxic thyroid adenomas. Endocrinology. 2000;141:722–730.
[PubMed]LalliE, Sassone-CorsiP. Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)–directed induction of the
CREM gene in the thyroid gland participates in the long-term desensitization of the TSH receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:9633–9637.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]HaraguchiK, ShimuraH, LinL, Saito TendoT, OnayaT. Functional expression of thyrotropin receptor in differentiated 3T3–L1 cells: a possible model cell line of extrathyroidal expression of thyrotropin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1996;223:193–198.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]TzameliI, FangH, OlieroM, et al. Regulated production of a peroxisome proliferators activated receptor gamma ligand during an early phase of adipocyte differentiation in 3T3–L1 adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:36093–36102.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]