It was possible to obtain high-quality MRI in the cadaveric monkey specimens. Cross-sectional areas of the LR and MR EOMs were determined in each image plane in which these structures were adequately defined. Area centroids were determined by tracing as the globe equator the EOM contours
(Fig. 2)from near the orbital apex to as far anteriorly as possible. Image planes were numbered relative to zero at the globe–optic nerve junction.
Figure 3illustrates MR and LR cross-section areas plotted along the lengths of the EOMs in all monkeys. In both the LR and MR of all specimens, cross-sectional area increased uniformly from the origin, peaked in midorbit, and then declined toward the insertion. Between 3 and 6 mm posterior to the globe–optic nerve junction, the cross-sectional area of the MR was at its maximum in all orbits.
M. nemestrina specimens were older than those of the other species, and these specimens exhibited larger horizontal rectus EOM cross sections than did the other species. For each EOM, the cross sectional area was maximal in midorbit, but there was considerable variability in cross-sectional area among animals. With the small population of monkeys available, we segregated the data based on ocular alignment, and found variability between the monkeys, primarily due to the wide age range. Despite the differences among these animals, the trend for the EOM cross-sectional area remained the same. We did not attempt to describe the variability that may be introduced by gender or species. Exceptionally large cross-sections (
Fig. 3 , 79434) were obtained from a 22-year-old naturally esotropic
M. nemestrina, the oldest and largest of all specimens. Data from monkey 79434 was therefore excluded from the computed mean values, because this animal was an outlier. Monkeys 1J1 (right orbit), 79434 (left orbit), and 124G (left orbit) did not have sufficiently clear images of EOMs to make reliable cross-sectional measurements.
Table 2shows the mean maximum cross-sectional areas of the MR and LR EOMs in normal and strabismic monkeys measured from histology after correcting for shrinkage.
Although
Figure 3suggests no obvious differences between orthotropic and strabismic animals, the difference was explored statistically with an automated hierarchical clustering analysis. If horizontal rectus EOMs in strabismic monkeys differs from those of orthotropic monkeys, the cross-sectional area data from these two groups should cluster significantly differently from one another. Instead, the dendrograms for all image planes (−7 through +6) clustered primarily according to cross-sectional area of EOM, and the remainder of the clustering was not based on any specific category such as species, age, or gender, with no clustering according to binocular alignment or laterality
(Fig. 4) . The outlier monkey (79434) was included in the analysis, but segregated uniquely, as expected.
Figure 5shows coronal MRIs of both orbits in a normal and in a
Macaca mulatta with induced exotropia, demonstrating the ALR in each. The ALR was either not observable or was too small for reliable study by MRI in most of the monkeys, and so was histologically evaluated instead. It was bilaterally evident in all orbits examined histologically.
Table 2shows the mean maximum ALR, MR, and LR cross-sectional areas of each orbit. Data from three normal monkeys were compared with those of five strabismic animals, for a total of 11 orbits. The cross section of the ALR, however, was less than 9% of LR cross section in orthotropic and less than 15% of LR cross section in strabismic monkeys, and its cross section also varied widely among animals. Mean ALR cross-sectional area in normal monkeys was 1.2 ± 0.5 mm
2, not significantly different from the value of 2.0 ± 1.0 mm
2 (
P = 0.16) in esotropic monkeys and 1.2 ± 0.1 mm
2 in the exotropic monkey. Mean ALR length was 15.1 ± 3.3 mm, in contrast to the mean lengths of 33.0 ± 4.6 and 38.5 ± 4.1 mm for the MR and LR, respectively.